General Area open meeting (AD and session chair: Brian Carpenter)
Wednesday morning
09:00 Welcome, and introduction (Brian Carpenter)
09:10 RFC 2434bis (Thomas Narten)
draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-04.txt (coming soon)
09:25 PESCI wrap-up (Scott Brim)
At 09:28 06/03/01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.interfax.cn/showfeature.asp?aid=10411slug=INTERNET-POLICY-MII-DOMAIN%20NAME-DNS
http://www.domainesinfo.fr/vie_extensions.php?vde_id=859
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:26:59 +0800, Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Stephane On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:26:23AM -0800,
Stephane Jefsey Morfin, disguised as Mohsen BANAN
Stephane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Stephane a message of 551 lines which said:
Hello Stephane
At 05:36 03/03/2006, Mark Andrews wrote:
They are still a problem whether you think they should exist
or not. The problem is that they are added unilaterally
and people using them expect everyone else to be able to
resolve them as well. The method of adding them
At 07:32 03/03/2006, Martin Duerst wrote:
At 09:28 06/03/01, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.interfax.cn/showfeature.asp?aid=10411slug=INTERNET-POLI
CY-MII-DOMAIN%20NAME-DNS
FYI - for those who don't read the announce list
--
Lucy E. Lynch Academic User Services
Computing CenterUniversity of Oregon
llynch @darkwing.uoregon.edu (541) 346-1774
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006
On 2 mar 2006, at 09.26, Mohsen BANAN wrote:
More than 5 years ago I predicted what the Chinese
government announced today.
What happened today:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
http://www.interfax.cn/showfeature.asp?aid=10411slug=INTERNET-
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
Whatever we may think it seems that countries allocate themselves
gTLDs, isn't it?
Exactly. And lets not forget the turkish multiligual TLDs which were
tested by the Public-Root on behalf of the Turkish government.
Peter Dambier wrote an excellent post to
Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
On 2 mar 2006, at 09.26, Mohsen BANAN wrote:
More than 5 years ago I predicted what the Chinese
government announced today.
What happened today:
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/28/eng20060228_246712.html
Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
To best of my knowledge, that there are no new Chinese root-servers -
despite what the press says. And at least we have not seen a drop in
queries to our anycast instance in Beijing yet so there even seems to
be data to support that...
There are. Check Peter
Mark Andrews wrote:
They are still a problem whether you think they should exist
or not. The problem is that they are added unilaterally
and people using them expect everyone else to be able to
resolve them as well. The method of adding them was wrong
Peter,
you can call them root servers, but actually they are servers listed
in the NTIA root. So they are TLD servers used as by the ISP as root
servers. This only seem to mean that the concept of root is not used.
This is a TLD forest. Experimentation we carried with dot-root made
us to
Total of 71 messages in the last 7 days through midnight, Thursday,
March 2 EST.
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
7.04% |5 | 9.23% |38893 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7.04% |5 | 5.86% |24683 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am away from the office until April. My access to email will be
very sporadic during this time.
For LDP problems please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general LDP questions, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For all other urgent matters, please contact my manager
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
There is nothing to do for the IETF or the Internet technical
community (whatever it is). The problem is 100 % political and should
be addressed in ICANN / WSIS / IGF / whatever but not in the IETF.
Good Lord - your spewing the crapola far and wide today. Like I
Elwyn == Elwyn Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Elwyn I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for
Elwyn this specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see
Elwyn http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Hi.
I'm sorry it has taken me so long to get
The IETF is pleased to announce its selection of Montreal, Canada as the site of
IETF 66 being held July 10th through July 14th 2006. This city with its rich
culture and history will be at its finest in the summer and the dates coincide
with the conclusion of the city's world renowned 27th
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications Service for Real Time Services
in the Internet Protocol Suite '
draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works-04.txt as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Transport Area Working Group
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Protocol (MOBIKE) '
draft-ietf-mobike-protocol-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IKEv2 Mobility and Multihoming Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Russ Housley and Sam
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document:
- 'Transferring MIB Work from IETF Bridge WG to IEEE 802.1 WG '
draft-harrington-8021-mib-transition-01.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
20 matches
Mail list logo
