Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-05.txt

2006-04-13 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I have reviewed this document. My comments are interspersed with Joe's. Salowey, Joe wrote: I reviewed this document ( Hash and Stuffing: Overlooked Factors in Network Device Benchmarking ) as part of a cross area security review. In general I think the document looks OK. I have a few

Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)

2006-04-13 Thread Brian E Carpenter
v | /\ +-+ / \ ++ | Upgrade |__/ ? \__| Give money | | To IPv6 | \/ | to Michel | +-+ \ / ++ \/ M. Tough call. Yes, it is. It's called long term strategic investment

RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)

2006-04-13 Thread Michel Py
Brian, Michel Py wrote: v | /\ +-+ / \ ++ | Upgrade |__/ ? \__| Give money | | To IPv6 | \/ | to Michel | +-+ \ / ++ \/ M. Tough call. Brian E Carpenter wrote:

RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)

2006-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Boeing had rolled out IPv6 in 1993-1994 when Eric wrote RFC1687 it would not have done anything to their bottom line as of today and wasted my money. If Boeing had rolled out IPv6 in 1993-1994 by now they would have an efficient production and real time inventory management; would have saved

RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)

2006-04-13 Thread Noel Chiappa
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] If Boeing had rolled out IPv6 in 1993-1994 by now they would have ... real time inventory management Wow! I've heard all sorts of claims for what IPv6 will do/include, but I must say that's a new one Noel

Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline

2006-04-13 Thread John C Klensin
Leslie, IAB, and others, Three observations on the schedule (included below for convenience), based on the events of the last month... (1) The initial STRAW PROPOSAL draft of the new RFC Editor charter, in your email of 16 March, says, in part,... The purpose of this straw proposal is to