Brian,
Its not just the disappearing link to the abstracts, it's the entire
organization of the site and the attitude that anyone that has any business
working with the IETF already knows where everything is.
I don't like playing twenty questions to find pieces of information
t
New Jabber Rooms for BOF’s:
offpath
rtpsec
dmsp
wai
Moving forward we will
request all jabber room changes two weeks before each event.
Thanks!!
NSS
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i
Alan, et al.
Message received.
I agree.
Changes being made.
Experiment provided valuable information.
Sorry for the pain.
Ray
IAD
Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
Folks;
I understand the utility and need for the administrative staff to have
a mailing alias for all registered delegates for the 66th IET
So, Phill, how about a polite note to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggesting that they add a link to
1id-abstracts.txt and to the ftp directory
to the page at http://www.ietf.org/ID.html?
Incidentally, if you type 'abstracts' into the search box
at www.ietf.org, the first hit is the 1i
I have to wonder if the 66attendees list or alias is being run congruent
with ietf mailing policy. it appears not.
joelja
Mail Delivery System wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipien
Folks;
I understand the utility and need for the administrative staff to have
a mailing alias for all registered delegates for the 66th IETF event.
However, in all the meetings I have attended - which is more than a
few, but less than most of you - I have never been deluged with such a
volume of
On 7/10/06 6:10 PM, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can borrow a room from an old WG/BOF (e.g.,
> ldup) in a pinch.
Right, but there's a rendezvous problem that particularly affects
those of us who are off-site.
However, midcom will not be meeting in Montreal, and if a BOF
fin
Two appeals have been responded today. A first reading shows an
impressive distance between the response and the matter of the
appeal. By respect for the IETF and duty to the IETF users I
represent, I will however appeal to the IAB.
The real issue is the interoperability between the Multilingu
At 05:43 PM 7/10/2006, Melinda Shore wrote:
>No Jabber rooms for BOFs!
You can borrow a room from an old WG/BOF (e.g.,
ldup) in a pinch.
- Kurt
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
No Jabber rooms for BOFs!
Thanks,
Melinda
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Its not that I have a big issue with it but is it really necessary to
assign 3 ipv6 global-scope addresses (in addition to two link-local)
for my interface (yes, I know we have plenty of ip space :)?
And BTW wasn't 6/6/6 the last day for 6-bone?
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you like, you may use ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/drafts.html. It is created daily (well, nightly) from http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/1id-index.txt.On Jul 10, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: The IETF Web site goes for terrible to worse. It is bad enough that the site is design
Just a reminder that we will spend a little time on
the question asked by this draft in plenary on Wednesday.
Brian
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
I start at the IETF home page, go to the ID drafts
page
Look for the abstracts and all I can find is the database
interface.
If its not in the index it does not
exist.
From: Andrew G. Malis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 12:39
PMTo: Hallam-Baker, Phil
Phill,
When you have operational questions about the site and any other
secretriat operations, could you please start by writing to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If that doesn't work you can escalate to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Brian
___
Ietf mailing list
Ie
Phillip,Did you mean http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/1id-abstracts.txt ? It's still there, as always. 1id-index.txt is also there.Cheers,
AndyOn 7/10/06, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The IETF Web site goes for terrible to worse. It is bad enough that the site is designed
The IETF Web site
goes for terrible to worse.
It is bad enough
that the site is designed with the UNIX 'hunt and ye shall find (if you are
lucky)' attitude. Now the ID index has disappeared and has been replaced with a
search by filename.
I am currently
trying to find two IDs, one sub
All;
The IAOC intends to promulgate an RFP for the RFC Editor function not
later than 31 July 2006. To that end we seek comments on the Statement
of Work located at:
http://koi.uoregon.edu/~iaoc/
This Statement of Work is a draft and will be updated to conform to the
final form of draft-man
18 matches
Mail list logo