New Jabber Rooms for BOFs:
offpath
rtpsec
dmsp
wai
Moving forward we will
request all jabber room changes two weeks before each event.
Thanks!!
NSS
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Brian,
Its not just the disappearing link to the abstracts, it's the entire
organization of the site and the attitude that anyone that has any business
working with the IETF already knows where everything is.
I don't like playing twenty questions to find pieces of information
For cost ($35 US), for cash, Canadian is good...
Spencer, who is not entirely sure where to post things like this now...
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Tuesday - Area Breakouts
John Klensin - downref document
Has been deferred to next telechat.
Some of Ted's concerns addressed in e-mail.
Bill has noticed that documents that are expedited aren't just numbered
early, they are published early - doesn't exactly match the document text.
Sam -
This was NOT intended for general distribution - my apologies...
Spencer
- Original Message -
From: Spencer Dawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 8:43 AM
Subject: My notes from this morning at breakfast
Tuesday
Tickets are claimed - will contact people after SIPPING for handoff...
Thanks,
Spencer
- Original Message -
From: Spencer Dawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 7:22 AM
Subject: Two tickets for social available
For cost ($35 US), for cash,
Ray,
I sent a similar email in reply to the endless thread on Internet access
at the Delta.
Please only allow emails to the participants list from IETF personel
for important meeting-related information.
Y(J)S
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Ray,
May I make a suggestion for the next time around?
How about if the registration page asks if you want
to be subscribed to this list?
As I understood it, this experiment was performed at
the request of people on the ietf discussion mailing list.
That list is _not_
Due to misprinted agenda.
Clarifying that 16ng is IP over IEEE 802.16 Networks
NOT IP over IEEE 802.11 Networks.
TUESDAY
13:00-15:00INT16ngIP over IEEE 802.16 Networks WG
Regards,
Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
Since officially beginning monday morning, participation and feedback on
the audio streaming has been pretty good. So far there have been 1148
streams requested on the remote server and 297 on the ietf-local one.
Just a few notes.
If you want use the streaming for impromptu meetings, the 8
Gray, Eric wrote:
Ray,
May I make a suggestion for the next time around?
How about if the registration page asks if you want
to be subscribed to this list?
Will do.
As I understood it, this experiment was performed at
the request of people on the ietf
On 11 jul 2006, at 09.07, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
This was NOT intended for general distribution - my apologies...
perhaps, but the timely transparency was refreshing.
thanks for the error.
a.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Please, take the opportunity that you are going to modify the registration
page to remind about the invoices.
In many economies/accounting systems, if you don't have an invoice, you
can't account (legally speaking) the cost of the IETF attendance. I've been
asking for this for more than 3 years
Avri Doria wrote:
This was NOT intended for general distribution - my apologies...
perhaps, but the timely transparency was refreshing.
thanks for the error.
+1
d/
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Today again someone took it upon themselves to send out router
advertisements even though they're not a legitimate IPv6 router, with
broken IPv6 connectivity as a result.
On the Mac, where IPv6 is enabled by default, so apparent but non-
working IPv6 connectivity is extremely annoying, you
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
traceroute6 to www.isc.org (2001:4f8:0:2::d) from
2001:510:102:100:20a:95ff:fecd:987a, 30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2001:510:102:100:206:d6ff:fe0f:b806 2.201 ms 7.626 ms 1.444 ms
2 2001:410:101:13::1 1.846 ms 1.736 ms 3.85 ms
3
Hi,
I do not wish to enter the substance of this appeal for i am
qualified neither by position nor training to adjudicate on the
justice of an appeal.
But I do want to question one paragraph that has been published on
behalf of the leadership of this organization. This questioning is
On 11-Jul-2006, at 05:32, Dean Anderson wrote:
BTW, the IESG response implied that the allegations of scientific
fraud
were (somehow) not substantiated.
I haven't seen these specific complaints voiced with this clarity
before (maybe I overlooked some mail). Perhaps this is a good
Phill,
The addresses to which one should report problems are not insider
information; they are displayed at the Secretariat page right off
the home page.
As for reorganizing the web site, yes, it would be nice to have
the resources to do that.
Brian
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Brian,
Hi Avri, all,
I totally agree on this. In fact, I've sent similar comments about this
statement to Brian yesterday when read the appeal response email.
All the organizations are oblige by higher lever laws, which can never be
ignored or even challenged with this kind of statement, and we should
All -
The IASA presentations will be part of Wednesday nights plenary and we
plan to hold an open office hour Thursday afternoon. If you have
follow up questions or comments please drop by.
IAOC Office - Room 521c
Thursday July 13th
1550-1650 office hour (overlaps the 1610-1700 Break)
Lucy
I don't think the IESg intended to imply that the IETF does not care
about human rights.
The IETF does have its own process rules intended to insure fairness,
and section 6.5.3 of RFC 2026 provides relief in cases where those
rules are inadequate.
However the IESG at least believes that while
At 21:41 11/07/2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
It is my personal opinion that Jefsey was trying to be legalistic, and
the IESG was legalistic in its response.
Dear Sam,
I only want one single thing: interoperability between the internet
of the users and the RFC 3935 IETF Internet as long as it
On 11-Jul-2006, at 11:14, Ray Pelletier wrote:
Nope. It was my attempt to provide *useful*, *important* info to
attendees only, and a list to send a meeting survey sometime after
the meeting. I did not implement it well.
More feedback for you on the implementation: the mail that was
Joe Abley wrote:
On 11-Jul-2006, at 11:14, Ray Pelletier wrote:
Nope. It was my attempt to provide *useful*, *important* info to
attendees only, and a list to send a meeting survey sometime after
the meeting. I did not implement it well.
More feedback for you on the implementation:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document:
- 'OCSP Extensions to IKEv2'
draft-myers-ikev2-ocsp-02.txt as a Proposed Standard
While IKEv2 supports public key based authentication (PKI), the
corresponding use of in-band CRLs is problematic
Adding WAE jabber room at 12:00noon ET (1 minute downtime)
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document:
- 'IMAP4 extension to SEARCH command for controlling what kind of information
is returned '
draft-melnikov-imap-search-ret-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document:
- 'EAP Password Authenticated Exchange '
draft-clancy-eap-pax-08.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.
29 matches
Mail list logo
