Thanks Max...
===[BEGIN]===
Invitation to the IETF 16ng Interim meeting, September 12-13, Frankfurt
area, Germany
Siemens has the pleasure to invite the IETF 16ng WG to the interim
meeting to take place in Mannheim, Germany. Mannheim is about 40 miles
south of Frankfurt and has e
Keith Moore wrote:
> Joe,
>
> What you say might have been true up until say the mid 1980s, but
> today, it's hard to defend that statement. For many years the vast
> majority of RFCs have been produced by IETF either from working groups
> or individual submissions.
That vast number does not e
> > What you say might have been true up until say the mid 1980s, but
> > today, it's hard to defend that statement. For many years the vast
> > majority of RFCs have been produced by IETF either from working groups
> > or individual submissions.
>
> That vast number does not establish the credib
Joe,
What you say might have been true up until say the mid 1980s, but
today, it's hard to defend that statement. For many years the vast
majority of RFCs have been produced by IETF either from working groups
or individual submissions. Several other RFCs that have been
published - e.g. documents
1. Is the 'strict' SNMP terminology intentionally avoided in Section 4.2
and associated diagrams, and why? Meaning why do we say 'SNMP get
message' instead of 'SNMP GetRequest PDU', etc. ?
2. Section 5.3.1
> The MIDCOM MIB module does not require a middlebox to implement
further specific MIB mod
