Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]

2006-08-27 Thread Eliot Lear
Frank Ellermann wrote: > Eliot Lear wrote: > > >> I would be curious as to what needs "fixing" before it >> becomes a full standard >> > > The issues you find when you enter "2616" in the form at > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html That sends you to > the outsourced http://purl.org/NET

Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]

2006-08-27 Thread Frank Ellermann
Eliot Lear wrote: > I now understand what you mean by outsourced. Sorry if that was unclear, I meant "errata not maintained by the RFC editor". > Most of these comments are truly editorial in nature, but > that happens with FULL standards as well. Agree, but while it's no full standard it would