Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>
>> I would be curious as to what needs "fixing" before it
>> becomes a full standard
>>
>
> The issues you find when you enter "2616" in the form at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html That sends you to
> the outsourced http://purl.org/NET
Eliot Lear wrote:
> I now understand what you mean by outsourced.
Sorry if that was unclear, I meant "errata not maintained by
the RFC editor".
> Most of these comments are truly editorial in nature, but
> that happens with FULL standards as well.
Agree, but while it's no full standard it would