On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5 '
draft-bellovin-keyroll2385-03.txt as an Informational RFC
...
The problems start when BOTH sides
Eliot,
The goal of draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-02 is
rather different from the goal of the two previous versions,
and it might have been better to change the file name
as well as removing 'critique' from the document title.
The intent of the -02 version is to document, for information
All,
Comments on the charter inline below.
-Original Message-
From: IESG Secretary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 7:30 AM
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
A new IETF working
Vidya good commentary, maybe I can add some more. The NEA, per the
charter-need's justification statement says:
Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA) architectures have been implemented
in the industry to assess the posture of endpoint devices
Ah two new terms of Art - Posture and Devices.
for
See http://www.isoc.org/tools/blogs/ietfjournal/?cat=9
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
