Re: Proceeding CDs

2006-10-07 Thread Fred Baker
To be honest, if the corporate sponsor doesn't know the answer to that level of question, they fundamentally don't get it. I have left companies over that level of disconnectedness before, and they in each case (note the plural) have departed from the industry not far behind. On Oct 7, 20

Re: [secdir] [New-work] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

2006-10-07 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
It appears that there was consensus to form a NEA working group at the last BoF meeting. Given that, I won't object to a WG being formed, but the charter needs to be more tightly scoped. I have asked for an applicability statement to be put on this work at the IETF. I will try and provide dr

Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

2006-10-07 Thread Douglas Otis
On Oct 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: At 01:42 AM 10/7/2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote: Many universities require their students to buy their own laptops, but prohibit certain types of activity from those laptops (like spamming, DDOS-attacks and the like). They would love

Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

2006-10-07 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
At 01:42 AM 10/7/2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote: Many universities require their students to buy their own laptops, but prohibit certain types of activity from those laptops (like spamming, DDOS-attacks and the like). They would love to have the ability to run some kind of NEA procedure to ens

Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

2006-10-07 Thread todd glassey
Harald - get Microsoft to buy into this idea and its done. Todd Glassey - Original Message - From: "Harald Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Narayanan, Vidya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 1:42 AM Subject: Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network

Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

2006-10-07 Thread Harald Alvestrand
The reason we left it open is to allow the working group to spend more > time exploring the range of use cases in this area to better determine > requirements and applicability. For example, it may be useful to > classify endpoints as network-managed versus user-managed versus > 3rd-party managed

Re: Proceeding CDs

2006-10-07 Thread Lars Eggert
On Oct 7, 2006, at 0:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i've been told that it is often useful to have a token of the money that was spent. and for some, the hardcopy proceedings filled the bill nicely. The CD, while not quite the same impact for mgmt, does provide a t