Re: *.ppt slides

2006-11-14 Thread Ray Pelletier
>From the Secretariat: All PowerPoint slides are converted to HTML files for the website and PDF files for the CD-Rom. In both places the original PPT files will be available as well. Rebecca Bunch Ray IAD John Levine wrote: Hi, will the *.ppt slides be converted again to *.html ?

Re: *.ppt slides

2006-11-14 Thread Frank Ellermann
Rebecca Bunch wrote: All PowerPoint slides are converted to HTML Thanks. For the impatient yet theologically pure No theologoy on my part, just an old box with very limited HD space and an old OS/2. As soon as the HTML version is availble I like ppt better than similar but monstrous PDFs.

Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

2006-11-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Robert G. Cole wrote: I whole-heartedly agree. I believe the DoD must extend its notions of Precedence and Preemption to all applications, voice, video, web, ftp, mail, etc. ... This illustrates some of my concerns about this requirements work being done outside the IETF. 1. The DoD

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

2006-11-14 Thread Brian E Carpenter
(Catching up...) James M. Polk wrote: ... didn't the IESG, about 18 months ago (it may be longer) write a letter to either ITU-T or ETSI to stop attempting to extend RSVP, that it was supposed to be done in the IETF? I seem to remember that event occuring, though I admit I don't remember

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Eric Allman
Pekka, Thanks for your good comments, which I will try to answer as best as I can. Advice from our AD and WG Chairs was that in Last Call the point is not to continue Working Group deliberations, but to (a) find minor wording issues, and (b) find show stoppers. In several cases you have

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Joe Abley
On 13-Nov-2006, at 22:45, Eric Allman wrote: By putting the record in a subdomain we believe we have avoided the major issues associated with TXT records. I would not be surprised if someone proposes a new RR; if so we'll deal with that as the time comes. It just didn't seem necessary

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Paul Hoffman
At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote: For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what friction do you expect? As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments. This has been beaten to death on the DKIM WG mailing list. As expected, different people had

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Joe Abley
On 14-Nov-2006, at 17:03, Paul Hoffman wrote: At 4:17 PM +0100 11/14/06, Joe Abley wrote: For the benefit of those who do not follow dnsext closely, what friction do you expect? As Eric stated in his message, we should not rehash old arguments. This has been beaten to death on the DKIM

Willing to serve a new term in the IAOC

2006-11-14 Thread Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo)
Hello everybody, As people have asked me if I'm going to be available serving as a member of the IAOC the next term, I would like to inform everybody about my intentions. I would like to continue in the IAOC if people feel my contribution is still needed/wanted. Please, indicate to the NomCom

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Dave Crocker
Joe Abley wrote: Indeed, I wasn't attempting to rehash an old argument specifically about DKIM. Excellent. Thanks! I rather thought that the general difficulties (perceived, actual, or otherwise) might be worth enumerating in a more general forum so that they are better-known. I doubt

Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

2006-11-14 Thread Tony Hansen
Eric Allman wrote: --On November 8, 2006 12:05:07 AM +0200 Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == what is the expected verifier's behaviour if one or more of these MUST/MUST NOTs doesn't hold? AFAICS, that hasn't been specified, at least not very clearly. Should it be? This is

Protocol Action: 'IPsec Security Policy Database Configuration MIB' to Proposed Standard

2006-11-14 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'IPsec Security Policy Database Configuration MIB ' draft-ietf-ipsp-spd-mib-07.txt as a Proposed Standard This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF Working Group. The IESG contact person is Russ Housley. A

Last Call: 'The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-framework)

2006-11-14 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Robust Header Compression WG to consider the following document: - 'The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework ' draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-framework-03.txt as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and

RFC 4731 on IMAP4 Extension to SEARCH Command for Controlling What Kind of Information Is Returned

2006-11-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4731 Title: IMAP4 Extension to SEARCH Command for Controlling What Kind of Information Is Returned Author: A. Melnikov, D. Cridland

RFC 4722 on Media Server Control Markup Language (MSCML) and Protocol

2006-11-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4722 Title: Media Server Control Markup Language (MSCML) and Protocol Author: J. Van Dyke, E. Burger, Ed., A. Spitzer Status:

RFC 4720 on Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Frame Check Sequence Retention

2006-11-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4720 Title: Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Frame Check Sequence Retention Author: A. Malis, D. Allan, N. Del Regno

RFC 4716 on The Secure Shell (SSH) Public Key File Format

2006-11-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4716 Title: The Secure Shell (SSH) Public Key File Format Author: J. Galbraith, R. Thayer Status: Informational Date: November 2006

RFC 4715 on The Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) Subaddress Encoding Type for tel URI

2006-11-14 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4715 Title: The Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) Subaddress Encoding Type for tel URI Author: M. Munakata, S. Schubert,