Fred Baker wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
There was very little support outside of those involved in the ieprep
working group for the ieprep work.
I'd have to say that there wasn't really a clear consensus in either
direction about much of anything.
I guess I'm
Brian,
1. There's a presumption that precedence and preemption are the
mechanisms - but those aren't requirements, they are solutions, and
it isn't clear to me that they can ever be appropriate solutions
in the upper layers of the Internet. The requirement is presumably
that important
Eliot Lear wrote:
Brian,
1. There's a presumption that precedence and preemption are the
mechanisms - but those aren't requirements, they are solutions, and
it isn't clear to me that they can ever be appropriate solutions
in the upper layers of the Internet. The requirement is presumably
that
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
2. There's clearly a need, if the work is to be expanded into new
applications areas, for the experts in those applications to be
deeply involved. That is in fact the main argument why the work
should be done in the IETF if it's done at all. I
Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 05:20:31 AM:
Speaking only for myself: I'm now reasonably satisfied that if this work
is to be done, it will be done better in the IETF than in the ITU.
However, looking at the last draft of the charter that I've seen, I am
Janet, See inline, Cheers, Martin
Janet wrote:
The mis-perception that the WG is focused on precedence and preemption
is, unfortunately, reinforced by the list of milestones, which focus on
the
military environment.
I would also, as an individual, favor modification to the list of
milestones
Martin,
yes, I agree.
Janet
Dolly, Martin C, ALABS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/01/2006 02:05:54 PM:
Janet, See inline, Cheers, Martin
Janet wrote:
The mis-perception that the WG is focused on precedence and preemption
is, unfortunately, reinforced by the list of milestones, which
From: Casey Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: Thank you for your Open Forum submission.
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:14:41 -0800
From: Chronicle Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Casey Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Thank you for your Open Forum submission.
Date:
Most all domain disputes can be connected to INFRINGEMENT issues in other
areas.
From: Casey Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:13:47 -0800
Casey Farrell, AuthorSan
Most all omain disputes can be connected to INFRINGEMENT issues in other
areas.
From: Casey Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:13:47 -0800
Casey Farrell, AuthorSan
10 matches
Mail list logo
