Yes, http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html
is the random web page version that I anticipate will become
an ION. This is a very good illustration of
a) something that needs to be accessible without an arbitrary
6 month expiry
b) needs to evolve
c) needs some minimal level of
Hi Lakshminath,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:43:34PM -0800, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote:
Hi Bernard, Yoshi,
Many thanks for your reviews and notes. I am going to try and
address the overarching issues. Once we settle on those, we can take
care of the details.
* On the use of the term
From what I understand, the 3GPP2 lower layer definition is still in
progress, but there has been no liaison request from 3GPP2 to IETF to review
it. From the document, I wasn't clear to me if GEE is included in the 3GPP2
lower layer definition. Presumably it would have to be in order to work
Hi Yoshi,
Thanks for your followup comments. I understand that your opinion is
that each lower layer should do it on its own and perhaps some lower
layers will follow that track. In the 3GPP2 case, it was deemed a
good idea to do it in a generic sense for some degree of
genericness. As
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Yes, http://www.ietf.org/u/ietfchair/discuss-criteria.html
is the random web page version that I anticipate will become
an ION. This is a very good illustration of
a) something that needs to be accessible without an arbitrary
6 month expiry
b) needs to evolve
c) needs
I agree with your points here, and I think it points up something I
have been feeling about this and not putting words to.
I really don't think the issue is whether it is a web page, an I-D,
an RFC, or something else. The point is that we need a document
process that will allow people to
Total of 19 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Dec 29 00:03:01 EST 2006
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
10.53% |2 | 23.16% |47605 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10.53% |2 | 20.44% |42021 | [EMAIL
