Could we drop the personal comments and rude words please?
The delete key is by far the easiest way to deal with drivel.
This is so clearly drivel that I hereby ask the sergeants at
arms to consider action against [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian
___
Ietf
Frank,
I'd have to go further than what you wrote. I believe the document
should explicitly discuss interactions with DKIM, as that document is in
front of the IESG at this time for approval as a Proposed Standard.
Many modifications to a message will invalidate a DKIM signature. It
may
Adrian Farrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, would it be possible for all DISCUSSes and COMMENTs for
I-Ds originated by a working group to be *automatically* copied to the
mailing list of the working group? The reasons are:
- the WG chairs, editors, and interested parties should
not
Agreement, but niggles
As Spencer has noted, a DISCUSS often passes through several iterations
from the time a concern is raised to the time it's clear what has to be
discussed with the WG. I think it would make the IESG's work more difficult
if every iteration of such DISCUSSes were
