Ted Hardie wrote:
At 4:59 PM +0100 1/10/07, Eliot Lear wrote:
The reason I'm concerned is that any form of OPES might invalidate a DKIM
signature. What can we say in a DKIM sense about OPES trace information?
Do you mean, should a DKIM server sign OPES trace information?
Maybe one of you
At 4:59 PM +0100 1/10/07, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>The reason I'm concerned is that any form of OPES might invalidate a DKIM
>signature. What can we say in a DKIM sense about OPES trace information?
Do you mean, should a DKIM server sign OPES trace information? The DKIM
base document says:
4. Se
Hi Ted,
I don't think adding explicit interactions with DKIM is appropriate for this
document,
which is a high-level informational document on the set of problems of adapting
OPES (developed in a bidirectional model) to SMTP, which has very different
usage.
The reason I'm concerned is tha
While more information is always good, I'll note that it's linked to
from the WG Chairs page; it, in turn, is listed on the IETF home page.
There's also a link from each WG's charter page to the status page
which lists every document from the WG and its status. The status
field, in turn, is a l
