Hi! These documents contains normative ASN.1 modules which, if I
understand the documents correctly, is typically included in
implementations of this standard. Is that correct?
The modules contain this notice:
-- Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006). This version of
-- this ASN.1 module is
Hey, I had promised to keep out of this having already used my quota of
emails for the months, but then Fred said...
That said, I _do_ wish the tracker would maintain history of DISCUSS and
COMMENT comments, instead of only showing the latest ballot text.
It does. Click "view details", and
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 00:42 -0500, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Eliot Lear said...
> > I'd have to go further than what you wrote. I believe the document
> > should explicitly discuss interactions with DKIM, as that document is in
> > front of the IESG at this time for approval as a Proposed Standard.
Simon, you are mixing several issues in your note, including strictly
legal issues and personal preferences.
Firstly, it is clear that you (and every other implementor using this
document) needs the ability to extract and use the ASN.1 include in
the document. That is already provided for in
Markus Hofmann wrote:
The intend of publishing this document before dissolving the WG is to
have the discussion on how the IAB considerations apply to OPES/SMTP
written down, in case individual contributors might pick-up the
OPES/SMTP work later on (although we don't have indication this migh
"Joel M. Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon, you are mixing several issues in your note, including strictly
> legal issues and personal preferences.
I bring up only one issue here: Can implementers extract and use the
ASN.1 module for their implementations legally?
> Firstly, it is cle
Dave,
Thank you. This is extremely helpful.
I suggest that the document have something like your above text added to
the Introduction.
Agreed, good suggestion. We'll add some words in.
Thanks,
Markus
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https:/
Hi -
> From: "Simon Josefsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Joel M. Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 12:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation
> X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
...
> > Firstly, it is cle
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:38:16 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Joel M. Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Simon, you are mixing several issues in your note, including
> > strictly legal issues and personal preferences.
>
> I bring up only one issue here: Can implementer
