RE: IETF IP Contribution Policy

2007-01-27 Thread Yaakov Stein
Larry Rosen, It is indicative of your letter's content that the introduction informs us that the IETF is the SDO responsible for Ethernet and WiFi (well, they both start with IE don't they?). Getting down to the letter itself. IETF, the most democratic and open of standards organizations,

Re: FW: Last Call: draft-heard-rfc4181-update (RFC 4181 Update to Recognize the IETF Trust) to BCP

2007-01-27 Thread C. M. Heard
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Frank Ellermann wrote: C. M. Heard wrote: The draft is intended to do the same thing for RFC 4181 that RFC 4748 did for RFC 3978. Comments, if any, should be directed to . Now that you ask, your patches are straight forward, so why not simply apply them and publish a comp

Re: FW: Last Call: draft-heard-rfc4181-update (RFC 4181 Update to Recognize the IETF Trust) to BCP

2007-01-27 Thread Frank Ellermann
C. M. Heard wrote: > The draft is intended to do the same thing for RFC 4181 > that RFC 4748 did for RFC 3978. Comments, if any, should > be directed to . Now that you ask, your patches are straight forward, so why not simply apply them and publish a complete new 4181bis ? Patchwork RFCs are IM

Re: Last Call: draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis (SMTP Service Extension for Authentication) to Proposed Standard

2007-01-27 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Frank Ellermann wrote: Lisa Dusseault wrote: are we looking at the same version of this doc? No, the last called is -07, it doesn't REQUIRE [DIGEST-MD5] anymore: | Note that many existing client and server implementations implement | CRAM-MD5 [CRAM-MD5] SASL mechanism. In order to ins