On Thu Feb 1 19:17:00 2007, IETF member Dave Aronson wrote:
Michael Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is interest, I will make a list. If someone has a more
PC
name, I'll use it.
As we all know, the absolutely most critically important thing
about any project, and a
And think of the Security Considerations section. (And do we need IANA
considerations, too?)
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 2007-02-01 20:06, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Brian Carpenter wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/content/ions/drafts/ion-procdocs.html
I liked the I-D better, the xml2rfc HTML output is hard to read.
Really? I find the links in the HTML version invaluable.
For an ION you could probably remove
Total of 71 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Feb 2 00:53:01 EST 2007
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
8.45% |6 | 11.68% |46481 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9.86% |7 | 8.93% |35530 | [EMAIL
I'd have to agree with Pekka. We've just gone through this with ATIS
and reliable accounting, which is quite a bit messier than this
problem. So long as the log indicates that something bad has happened,
it seems to me that you're covered. Of course, with reliability comes
some amount of
I'm going to No Objection and I suppose you'll do an RFC Editor note.
Brian
On 2007-01-30 16:39, Mark Townsley wrote:
On second look, this is rather small. Vipin, I can do either. If you
wish to provide me text in OLD NEW format, or a new document.
- Mark
Suresh Krishnan wrote:
I am
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I liked the I-D better, the xml2rfc HTML output is hard to read.
Really? I find the links in the HTML version invaluable.
Me too, but I prefer the rfcmarkup HTML version of the I-D, for
starters it uses a monospaced font, it doesn't spice the output
with character
--On 2. februar 2007 10:06 + Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And think of the Security Considerations section. (And do we need IANA
considerations, too?)
For this subject, there is absolutely no way to avoid an
internationalization considerations section - and of course
At 7:55 AM -0800 2/2/07, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
(seriously: Just Do It!)
Isn't this a perfect test case for the IETF meeting Wiki? I know that
there was little contribution in San Diego, but this sounds like a
good opportunity to see if folks can find and edit the wiki.
--Paul
Paul Hoffman wrote:
there was little contribution in San Diego, but this sounds like
a good opportunity to see if folks can find and edit the wiki.
I found it but couldn't edit it, so that question is IMO answered.
Frank
___
Ietf mailing list
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 08:31:49AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Wether it is a bug or a feature depends on your requirments. On some
high-security environments, people prefer to suspend the service
rather than not being able to log it. (Otherwise, an attacker could
easily attempt many
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF '
draft-ietf-ospf-mt-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Open Shortest Path First IGP Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Bill Fenner and Ross Callon.
A URL of this
12 matches
Mail list logo
