On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:39:21PM -0500,
The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
- 'The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set '
draft-kunze-rfc2413bis-05.txt as an Informational RFC
There are a few problems regarding this draft which have been sent to
the author,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:40:16PM -0500,
The IESG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
- 'URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type '
draft-wilde-text-fragment-06.txt as a Proposed Standard
There are a few problems regarding the ABNF of this draft which
-Original Message-
From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..60))
be amended to exclude the 1-character case. I assume that a
zero-length tag, while also not defined in RFC 4646, was
included in
the I-D to allow the special
1 - The document goes beyond specifying how to determine if a message
is validly signed by a given signer. The core of the dispute is the following
proposed sentence:
| When the collection represents more than one signature, the successful
| validation of one of signature
To the second point:
Denis:
you describe that the text concerning how to determine one signer with
multiple
signature is weak, nobody has disagreed, the text says 'ought to be'
'usually' etc.
but then you start a new discussion about a single signature
verification which
is IMO not related
Please see the text in the updated document. This was changed in the
most recent version:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-cms-mult-sign-03.txt
Russ
At 09:50 AM 2/15/2007, Peter Sylvester wrote:
1 - The document goes beyond specifying how to determine if a message
by error I send the following only to Russ
1:
When more than one signature is present, the successful validation
| of one signature associated with a given signer is usually treated
| as a successful signature by that signer.
in this text is sued twice but with different meanings, maybe this
My individual opinion is that these changes are a matter of style, and
that the current text is fine. If there is strong support for these
changes I can enter an rfc editor note.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
There are two (2) Internet-Draft cutoff dates for the 68th
IETF Meeting in Prague, Czech Republic:
February 26th: Cutoff Date for Initial (i.e., version -00)
Internet-Draft Submissions
All initial Internet-Drafts (version -00) must be submitted by Monday,
February 26th at 9:00 AM ET. As
