On 03/30/2007 13:56 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
For whatever it is worth, I think we need to step carefully
around the distinction Paul makes above: there are almost
certainly circumstances in which we should accept a broader
grant of rights conditional on standardization and a narrower
one if
--On Saturday, 31 March, 2007 08:49 -0400 Scott W Brim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/30/2007 13:56 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
For whatever it is worth, I think we need to step carefully
around the distinction Paul makes above: there are almost
certainly circumstances in which we should
Jeff,
As for informational vs an independent submission, I think there is a
factor to be considered. It seems to me that an informational IETF
document is a fine way to say this is a good idea, and we think this
is the right way to do FOO, but we can't actually recommend it (for
whatever
On 2007-03-31 17:15, Eliot Lear wrote:
Jeff,
As for informational vs an independent submission, I think there is a
factor to be considered. It seems to me that an informational IETF
document is a fine way to say this is a good idea, and we think this
is the right way to do FOO, but we can't
