Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
bad idea.
The
Michael StJohns wrote:
Going back to the original problem, it might be more useful to use an xml
diff program than a text diff program since that's where the changes will
be made (and visible). The anchors and targets will stay stable.
Maybe we can have this added to the tool set?
+1
d/
What has happened in this case is very clear. I believe that Sam is
handling the situation properly.
Russ
At 11:18 AM 4/7/2007, todd glassey wrote:
Russ - does the current policy of the IETF's IPR disclosure process
include what happens to a filing when the IPR disclosure is NOT
FILED in a
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'DNSSEC Experiments '
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the DNS Extensions Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Mark Townsley and Jari Arkko.
A URL of this Internet-Draft
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'DNSSEC Opt-In '
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in-09.txt as an Experimental RFC
This document is the product of the DNS Extensions Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Mark Townsley and Jari Arkko.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
