Re: [Emu] Last call comments: draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01.txt: EAP channel bindings

2007-04-12 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
Hi Sam, Here is my take on this topic: After having reviewed draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01, I feel that putting EAP in scope of that document would require a rather involved revision of the document. As Charles noted it might require further abstraction of the concept of channel

Re: [Emu] Last call comments: draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01.txt: EAP channel bindings

2007-04-12 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:03:29PM -0700, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: After having reviewed draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01, I feel that putting EAP in scope of that document would require a rather involved revision of the document. As Charles noted it might require further abstraction

Re: Last Call: draft-williams-on-channel-binding (On the Use ofChannel Bindings to Secure Channels) to Proposed Standard

2007-04-12 Thread Tom.Petch
inline Tom Petch - Original Message - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Randy Presuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jeffrey Hutzelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:19 PM Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-williams-on-channel-binding (On the Use

Re: [Emu] Last call comments: draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01.txt: EAP channel bindings

2007-04-12 Thread Lakshminath Dondeti
Hi Nico, Please see inline: Nicolas Williams wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:03:29PM -0700, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: After having reviewed draft-williams-on-channel-binding-01, I feel that putting EAP in scope of that document would require a rather involved revision of the document. As