Re: ADs speaking for their WGs

2007-04-22 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2007-04-20 23:58, Theodore Tso wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:56:38PM -0400, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote: But the more serious case involved IPSEC. The situation was thus: ~20 people for one proposal. ~20 people for a different proposal ~150 people for someone please decide so we can go

AW: [Geopriv] Irregularity at the GEOPRIV Meeting at IETF 68

2007-04-22 Thread Tschofenig, Hannes
Hi Bernard, I agree with your statement that we should let the market decide when it comes to this particular case where we have many different solutions (developed by different SDOs) already. Let me add one more message that got posted to the GEOPRIV mailing list in this context: Lyn Moore

Re: Last Call: draft-shacham-sipping-session-mobility (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Mobility) to Informational RFC

2007-04-22 Thread Cullen Jennings
As far as I can tell, there are three people that have posted an email abut this document in and some of theses got back to early 2005. I don't think this document has received adequate review from the SIP community. It seems like the SH mode is preferable to the MMC mode in general