On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Ned Freed wrote:
>
> My one concern is with the recommendation that MSAs by default try the
> submit port first and if that fails fall back to port 25. I have no
> problem with recommending a submit port configuration - it's the
> fallback process that concerns me.
In my ideal
--On Sunday, June 10, 2007 07:31 -0700 Dave Crocker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> trust. Given the prohibitions in this document, where are
>> those devices left? Am I correct in assuming that this
>> document would intend to prohibit those devices as
>> non-conforming?
>
> No.
>
> If the
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, william(at)elan.net wrote:
>
> Sendmail does not authenticate automatically or otherwise. What it does
> is to use as RFC2821 MAIL FROM account of the user that invoked it or
> when "-f" option is used puts out account of the user in the trace data.
>
> This is not authenticati
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to send emails
at 2 am? :-)
cron sends email by invoking sendmail, which knows the user that invoked
it. authentication is therefore automatic and ha
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to send emails
> at 2 am? :-)
cron sends email by invoking sendmail, which knows the user that invoked
it. authentication is therefore automatic and has been the norm for ever.
Tony.
--
f.a
--On Sunday, June 10, 2007 07:31 -0700 Dave Crocker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
trust. Given the prohibitions in this document, where are
those devices left? Am I correct in assuming that this
document would intend to prohibit those devices as
non-conforming?
No.
If the devices (or cron
John C Klensin wrote:
--On Saturday, June 09, 2007 20:00 + John Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to
send emails at 2 am? :-)
Perhaps a sentence or two clarifying that this only applies to
SMTP and SUBMIT would be in order
But the
Stephane,
Thanks for posting a comment. I hope that more folks do...
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
It seems that there is not a lof of content left from the first, much
more normative versions of this document, which were issued a long
time ago.
The spamops effort has been dominated by a desir
