Soininen == Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Soininen Hi, I just happened to read this mail today. I don't
Soininen remember seeing such a mail during previous nomcom
Soininen rounds (they might have come, but I just didn't notice
Soininen them). I think
Done.
At 06:29 PM 7/23/2007, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Also these descriptions have evolved from year to year
(there is a version in the IESG wiki too, at
http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/AreasDescription,
maybe the IESG should bring it up to date...)
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The webpage for the streaming has been updated to reflect the
schedule
for monday and tuesday.
http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf/
One addition is that we intend to record and broadcast the Sunday
IEPG
meeting
Some additional comments on the topic:
In particular, taking the security area requirements as an example, the
description provided talks about expertise needed based on the current
ongoing work in the security area. While this is one part, we want ADs
that can bring in/ evaluate new work which
The IAOC will again be holding open office hours in Parlor A on
Wednesday 16.00-17.00
Thursday 16.00-17.00
On behalf of the IAOC
- kurtis -
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
One important thing needs to be considered in the Security and OM
Areas. There are two ADs, and they are expected to have somewhat
different skill sets. For contrast, here are the requirements that
were provided to NomCom2006 for these positions.
Russ
Marc Manthey wrote:
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The webpage for the streaming has been updated to reflect the schedule
for monday and tuesday.
http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf/
One addition is that we intend to record and broadcast the
Sam, Jonne,
Its important to find the right balance between getting
someone who fits exactly the current situation and getting
someone who is the best candidate in a more long term
view.
The ADs in an area need to have an excellent understanding
of the technology the area deals with. Typically,
I already have links to Agendas, Jabber-rooms, Meeting-materials,
draft tarballs and room location on http://tools.ietf.org/agenda, so
it seems like a good idea to add links to the audio streams, too
(in addition to any mention which is added to the IETF69 Meeting page).
seems to me that
Jari == Jari Arkko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jari (I also thought that the SEC requirements were a bit too
Jari specific this year.)
They are no more specific this year than they have been in the past.
The only change is that they were at least specific in a direction
that would
Sam,
They are no more specific this year than they have been in the past.
Ok -- I did not re-read the ones from past years. Just reacting on
the current text.
The only change is that they were at least specific in a direction
that would actually compliment the sitting AD.
That's
Hi,
I agree with Vidya. To be honest, I really thought this was an oversight and
not intentional.
If the Security area has a similar split as the OM area, I think this
really should be discussed. To my understanding, we don't have such split
documented to any other area and I think this kind of
A modified charter has been submitted for the Kerberos (krb-wg) working
group in the Security Area of the IETF. The IESG has not made any
determination as yet. The modified charter is provided below for
informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG
mailing list ([EMAIL
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'The Atom Publishing Protocol '
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-17.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Atom Publishing Format and Protocol
Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Lisa Dusseault and Chris Newman.
A
14 matches
Mail list logo
