Re: Representation of end-users at the IETF (Was: mini-cores (was Re: ULA-C)

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:29:34PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:50:44AM +, > > Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > a message of 32 lines which said: > > > >> in the IETF, the naysayers pretty much kick the consenting adults' >

Re: Spam solution?

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: Check your "solution" againt FUSSP (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html) first. Indeed. Let's also not forget: d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net

Re: Renumbering

On 21-sep-2007, at 20:33, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Obviously this should be fixed. But: you may ask yourself: why is your system doing lookups when you obviously don't have IPv6 connectivity? Anyone from Microsoft listening? I suppose, in theory, a DNS query over v4 might return an

Re: Response to appeal dated 22-June-2007

Russ Housley wrote: I'd like to know if this is a topic of concern to people. I had not realized that IESG statements bound future IESGs. I find that in itself disturbing. Eliot ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/li

Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it

Noel Chiappa wrote: > From: Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > any relief for the Internet before IPv4 space is exhausted. I am so tired of this "when IPv4 space runs out, civilization will fall" vibe. I'm almost ready to suggest that we just hand out all the remaining IPv4 address space

Re: IPv6 will never fly: ARIN continues to kill it

> From: Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > any relief for the Internet before IPv4 space is exhausted. I am so tired of this "when IPv4 space runs out, civilization will fall" vibe. I'm almost ready to suggest that we just hand out all the remaining IPv4 address space today, now, just to g