On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Ned Freed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Contrary to that, XML processors do not resolve namespace URIs, they are
> > purely used as identifiers.
>
> That's certainly how things are supposed to work. It may or may not be how
> they
> actually work.
I agree with
> Tony Finch wrote:
> > The latest RISKS gibes an example of the magnitude of the problem of
> > unwanted traffic caused by using URLs instead of URNs for protocol
> > identification URIs. Perhaps the security considerations section of the
> > draft should describe some ways of mitigating it?
> >
>
Tony Finch wrote:
> The latest RISKS gibes an example of the magnitude of the problem of
> unwanted traffic caused by using URLs instead of URNs for protocol
> identification URIs. Perhaps the security considerations section of the
> draft should describe some ways of mitigating it?
>
> http://cat
The latest RISKS gibes an example of the magnitude of the problem of
unwanted traffic caused by using URLs instead of URNs for protocol
identification URIs. Perhaps the security considerations section of the
draft should describe some ways of mitigating it?
http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/25.07.htm
