(I am not a subscriber to the ietf list and would appreciate copies of
replies.)
SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 19:44 21-09-2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> The message is still meaningful; however, it violates a SHOULD in RFC
>> 2822 (well, sort of, depending on how you interpret "belong" in t
Harald Alvestrand wrote;
> - The discussion of permitting change to text was extensive and repeated.
> - The consensus of the working group was the compromise position now
> documented.
>
> I assert that if you want to claim that either of these two statements
> are false, YOU back it up with evid
My answer to Larry's question - Yes.
Regards,
Chuck
-
Chuck Powers,
Motorola, Inc
phone: 512-427-7261
mobile: 512-576-0008
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Rosen
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:14
At 10:13 AM -0700 9/25/08, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
>
>The proposed IETF IPR policy allows the public to modify the code present in
>IETF specifications but not to use that same specification to create
>modified text to document that modified code! Does anyone here honestly
>believe this is justifi
At 07:22 PM 9/24/2008, Dave CROCKER wrote:
John, et al,
John C Klensin wrote:
I've been waiting to respond to your draft until there was more
discussion on the list but, apparently, either the draft or
other circumstances killed that discussion.
I, too, waited to comment on it and see what t
Ted Hardie wrote:
> At 10:13 AM -0700 9/25/08, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
>
>> The proposed IETF IPR policy allows the public to modify the code present in
>> IETF specifications but not to use that same specification to create
>> modified text to document that modified code! Does anyone here honestly
Folks - I want to clarify and simplify the language of BCP78. The proposed
addition to BCP 78's Granting of Rights is as follows:
Existing
--
3.3. Granting of Rights and Permissions
By submission of a Contribution, each person actually submitting the
Contribution, and each named co
Hi Russ,
[I-D author requested Cc]
At 19:35 24-09-2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Well, I find that statement unobjectionable but essentially meaningless,
in that I don't think the document says anything substantively different
including that statement than without it. But if it makes others feel
mo
Total of 74 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Sep 26 00:53:01 EDT 2008
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
14.86% | 11 | 16.10% |80555 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8.11% |6 | 8.29% |41487 | [EMAIL PROTECTED
