Did a ping this morning from my residential broadband, was surprised to see
responses from an IPv6 address.
Woo-hoo!
Only small problem is the complete lack of IPv4.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Can you share their name ?
Should we start a site listing IPv6 providers ?
Regards
Marshall
On Oct 29, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Did a ping this morning from my residential broadband, was surprised
to see responses from an IPv6 address.
Woo-hoo!
Only small problem is
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> Can you share their name ?
>
> Should we start a site listing IPv6 providers ?
Something like:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=native
Which lists quite a number of them already, there is also a link to the
Japanese service providers of which there are quite
Document: draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2008-10-28
IETF LC End Date: 2008-11-04
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary:
This draft is almost ready for publication as an RFC. (The draft does
not identify the intended status--I assume it to be standards track
I got a failure report for [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Can that be updated to a
current address prior to publication?
Thanks!
Ben.
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Document: draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2008-10-28
IETF LC End Date: 2008-11-04
On 10/28/08 2:44 PM, Ben Campbell allegedly wrote:
> I got a failure report for [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Can that be updated to a
> current address prior to publication?
Just fyi he's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.or
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the quick review. Please find my comments inline.
> Summary:
>
> This draft is almost ready for publication as an RFC. (The
> draft does
> not identify the intended status--I assume it to be standards
> track).
> I have some questions that should be addressed first, as w
I made an editorial comment in my gen-art review of draft-ietf-isis-
hmac-sha-05, below:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:37 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
-- Section 8
The author list here does not match the first page. Should some of
these move to a "Contributors" section?
I have since had off-line di
Thanks!
I will address your other responses separately, but I wanted to hit
this one quickly:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 8:35 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
The author list here does not match the first page. Should some of
these move to a "Contributors" section?
Will fix this.
Please see m
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
One could, of course, make many of the same observations about
replacing SMTP and/or today's Internet mail formats with some newly-
invented and improved system, replacing HTTP with something more
elegantly designed based on what we know
The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Session Initiation Protocol WG
(sip) to consider the following document:
- 'Framework for Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS '
as a Proposed Standard
This document approval at the IESG level might signal a shift in
This draft introduces several areas where the vouching services
results could be exploited.
Section 3. Validation Process
2. Verifies legitimate use of that domain using one or more
_authentication_ mechanisms as described herein
This draft incorrectly describes Sender-ID and SFP as a do
Todd:
IPR disclosures that are required by BCP 79 are automatically posted
on the IETF's public IPR disclosure page (www.ietf.org/ipr). These
disclosures may be viewed by anyone. In addition, under Section 4(A)
of BCP 79, the RFC Editor is required to include in each RFC a notice
of any IPR
Can you share their name ?
Should we start a site listing IPv6 providers ?
Can you find a more appropriate list for this topic?
jaap
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
14 matches
Mail list logo
