Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04

2008-11-06 Thread Christian Vogt
Folks, I was asked to review draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04 as input for IESG evaluation, and I got three comments: (1) On the abstract: Developing NATs that meet this set of requirements will greatly increase the likelihood that applications using DCCP will function

Re: Review of draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04

2008-11-06 Thread RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont
On Thursday 06 November 2008 14:07:41 ext Christian Vogt, you wrote: (2) On requirements 1 and 3: REQ-1: A NAT MUST have an Endpoint-Independent Mapping behavior for DCCP. REQ-3: If application transparency is most important, it is RECOMMENDED that a NAT

draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header and last call draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04

2008-11-06 Thread Douglas Otis
New email headers' misuse of the term authentication will prove highly deceptive for recipients and damaging for domains! The Random House dictionary definition of authenticate says: 1. to establish as genuine. 2. to establish the authorship or origin of conclusively or unquestionably,

Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

2008-11-06 Thread Thomas Narten
Total of 32 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Nov 7 00:53:01 EST 2008 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 6.25% |2 | 34.49% | 132838 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.75% |6 | 21.25% |81824 | [EMAIL

Re: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard

2008-11-06 Thread SM
At 14:17 27-10-2008, The IESG wrote: The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Vouch By Reference' draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final

Intended Publication: RFC Editor Model (draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-02.txt)

2008-11-06 Thread IAB Chair
Dear Colleagues, The IAB and the IAOC have been working on a model that divides the responsibilities for the RFC Series into four functions: The RFC Series Editor, the Independent Submission Editor, RFC Production Center, and the RFC Publisher. The model outlined here is intended to increase

Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers) to Proposed Standard

2008-11-06 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Maintenance WG (6man) to consider the following document: - 'Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers ' draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-01.txt as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on

Document Action: 'Why Authentication Data suboption is needed for MIP6' to Informational RFC

2008-11-06 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Why Authentication Data suboption is needed for MIP6 ' draft-ietf-mip6-whyauthdataoption-07.txt as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the Mobility for IPv6 Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Jari Arkko and Mark