On 11/19/08 11:07 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Lisa Dusseault wrote (Re: Fwd: SIEVE bounced SIEVE bounce message):
Oh the irony. I send a message saying that the SIEVE document
refuse-reject has been approved, and it gets bounced by Elvey's SIEVE
filter.
Yes. Messages from Cyrus, Aaron and
On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Marc Manthey wrote:
Am 21.11.2008 um 06:56 schrieb Adrian Farrel:
Something to aspire to.
Get on the list, but be at the bottom.
0.62% |1 | 0.37% | 4035 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey adrian
take it easy , most people don´t even know what MPLS is ;)
There is actually some positive news on the US Visa front :
http://www.unitedstatesvisas.gov/visanews/index.html
President Bush Announces Visa Waiver Program Expansion - VWP travel
begins November 17
On October 17, President Bush announced the imminent expansion of the
Visa Waiver Program
Let us ask a different question
In what ways can the ietf act to maximize the information available to
the embassy in question to enable them to determine that the
application comes from an active ietf participant?
A letter of invitation to a conference is likely to carry less
Hi
In view of the several packet types we have similar naming and to avoid
confusion indicating
Similar fields for different packet types we need to have some
distinguishing factor
Indicating something like Labelled Traffic Differentiator or
Labelled Traffic class or
say MPLS Traffic
Fernando,
(1) The I-D Tracker says that the v6ops-v6onbydefault draft is Dead.
Relevant portions of that draft should be reproduced or otherwise
explained in Section 3.2.
The reference to this I-D has been updated to the corresponding RFC.
Thanks - please send the reference to the
Apologies for the late additional comment on this document.
Based on some earlier comments I made on the SIP list we made the
policyContactURI extensible to allow in the future the possibility to
use other URI schemes for the policy channel other than SIP and SIPS.
I think though that in
At 20:00 20-11-2008, Douglas Otis wrote:
It is rather startling that adoption of an experimental RFC is being
presumed by this draft. As such, those not adopting this
experimental PRA RFC run the risk of being
There are existing implementations of these experimental RFCs.
Adoption of this
On Nov 21, 2008, at 11:02 AM, SM wrote:
At 20:00 20-11-2008, Douglas Otis wrote:
It is rather startling that adoption of an experimental RFC is
being presumed by this draft. As such, those not adopting this
experimental PRA RFC run the risk of being
There are existing implementations of
The discussion today in Behave shows there is very strong peer-pressure
group-think with no serious analysis of the long term implications about
what is being discussed. I requested we pop this up a level to talk about
'make things better' by focusing on ---who--- we are making it better for.
The
Hi
I am Venkateshwaran(Venkat in short) from Chennai, India.
Please clarify my doubt in BGP4+ how next hop field is constructed?
Setup
=
Three routers RT1 , RT2 and RT3.
RT1 and RT2 are in same AS 100. RT3 is different AS 200.
RT1 and RT3 is connected with RT2.
Under this setup i need to
Hi
I am Venkateshwaran(Venkat in short) from Chennai, India.
Please clarify how do we trigger KeepAliveTimer_Expires event in OPENSENT
state. On the reception of OPEN message BGP FSM sets keepalive time value and
moves to OPENCONFIRM state, etc. In RFC 4271 i can see the effects because of
The IESG has received a request from the Session Initiation Protocol WG
(sip) to consider the following document:
- 'A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Session Policies '
draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-05.txt
as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Test vectors for STUN '
draft-ietf-behave-stun-test-vectors-04.txt as an Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Behavior Engineering for Hindrance
Avoidance Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Magnus Westerlund and
14 matches
Mail list logo
