Ray Pelletier wrote:
...
On 11 Feb I notified the 5 volunteers maintaining the tools and
templates that the Trustees
were voting on what I expected to be the last set of changes; advised
them of the changes and asked if they
could have the changes completed in a few days, e.g, 14 Feb.I aske
John,
John Sullivan wrote:
The Free Software Foundation and the GNU Project oppose publication
of "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization Extensions"
(draft-housley-tls-authz-extns) as a proposed standard. We do not
...
With the patent issue, i totally agree with you John. Personally i w
On Feb 22, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
Ray Pelletier wrote:
...
On 11 Feb I notified the 5 volunteers maintaining the tools and
templates that the Trustees
were voting on what I expected to be the last set of changes;
advised them of the changes and asked if they
could have the
On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:44 AM, John Levine wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-otis-2009-02-16.txt
This appeal boils down to "someone might misuse it so don't
standardize it." Is there any standard to which someone couldn't
have made a similar objection?
The appeal is in rega
The XML2RFC folks are busy producing a good version of xml2rfc that
deals with the new license statements. However in the meantime I have
a hacked up version that does seem to work at least some of the time.
You can find it at
http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/xml2rfc/1.34pre2-fluf
