Nick Levinson wrote:
> I think you didn't mean domain. In that case, the catchall address
> encourages delivery. I'm looking for a guaranteed bounce, for test
> purposes, at any email service provider.
Well know addresses tend to create opportunities for DOS.
Two other issues, such an approach wo
yeah, that's the 3777bis-ish change ;-)
Spencer
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:34 AM, ext Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Your memory matches mine. Do the notes need to reflect "nominee"
behavior, instead of "NomCom" behavior?
Just to make sure we're on the same page ... Joel reminded me after
I'd alrea
On Apr 1, 2009, at 10:34 AM, ext Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Your memory matches mine. Do the notes need to reflect "nominee"
behavior, instead of "NomCom" behavior?
Just to make sure we're on the same page ... Joel reminded me after
I'd already submitted a couple of versions of openlist that y
The repetition of "Eye-Think" is just a cultural humbleness.
Everyone is my load.
Let's sing a songs of democratic communication protocols.
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Reminds me of that classic riff from "In the Beginning" by the Moody
Blues:
"I think. I think I am. Therefore I am. I think."
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Reminds me of that classic riff from "In the Beginning" by the Moody Blues:
>
> "I think. I think I am. Therefore I am. I think."
I'm afraid he is just joking, though not very elegantly. :-)
Masataka Ohta
__
Spencer:
I made the suggested change to the minutes.
Russ
At 01:34 PM 4/1/2009, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Your memory matches mine. Do the notes need to reflect "nominee"
behavior, instead of "NomCom" behavior?
Just to make sure we're on the same page ... Joel reminded me after
I'd already su
Please note that some groups use jabber more or less continuously, not
just during a meeting.
Regards
Marshall
On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Jabber logs are already part of the proceedings. For example, this
URL provides the jabber logs for the IETF 73 in Minneapolis: htt
Jabber logs are already part of the proceedings. For example, this
URL provides the jabber logs for the IETF 73 in Minneapolis:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/index.html
The Secretariat is looking at some changes to the proceedings, and I
have asked them to put the jabber log and the a
Your memory matches mine. Do the notes need to reflect "nominee" behavior,
instead of "NomCom" behavior?
Just to make sure we're on the same page ... Joel reminded me after I'd
already submitted a couple of versions of openlist that you're a nominee if
NomCom is considering you, a candidate if
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Keith Moore writes:
>
>> while we're on the subject of better integration between mailing lists
>> and jabber, how about having the trailer at the bottom of every message
>> that is posted to an IETF WG list, include a URL that points to the
>> jabber chat room for that W
I believe the hum was about "lobbying" behavior of the candidates on
the open list toward NomCom and the rest of the community.
Russ
At 12:38 PM 4/1/2009, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Hi, Russ,
I may have misunderstood (I was presenting, so not taking good notes
during the NomCom discussions), bu
Hi, Russ,
I may have misunderstood (I was presenting, so not taking good notes during
the NomCom discussions), but I'm looking at
Russ asks who believes that we need to do anything that
describes what is acceptable NomCom behaviour.
many hums
Russ asks who doesn't believe this is
if `egrep -v 'joins the room|leaves the room' log | wc -l` > 0
post log
Translation: if, after removing the "joins the room" and "leaves the
room" messages are removed, you wind up with anything left, post the
log. This would eliminate almost all of the logs that have no
substantive inform
Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI wrote:
Dear profesionals,
You may be just proposing a social security hole, I think.?An idea of
End-to-end is too primitive like monkey world. I recommend an idea of
family-to-family.
At first, a nation should be considered as a set of home, right? In
other words, as
Excerpts from Tim Polk on Wed, Apr 01, 2009 10:53:38AM -0400:
> Good point. If we are serious about this, automating it is the only
> reasonable path.
but to start with maybe the chairs could send it out by hand? They
submit the meeting notes by hand.
__
Several changes to the NomCom process were discussed during the plenary
session last Wednesday. The minutes have been posted so that anyone that
was not at the plenary session can catch up. The minutes can be found
here:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/minutes/plenaryw.txt
The discuss
Keith Moore writes:
> while we're on the subject of better integration between mailing lists
> and jabber, how about having the trailer at the bottom of every message
> that is posted to an IETF WG list, include a URL that points to the
> jabber chat room for that WG?
Is more boiler plate texts
while we're on the subject of better integration between mailing lists
and jabber, how about having the trailer at the bottom of every message
that is posted to an IETF WG list, include a URL that points to the
jabber chat room for that WG?
Keith
___
Iet
Good point. If we are serious about this, automating it is the only
reasonable path. I like the idea of a minimum size for automatic
submission. If it is short but really important (e.g., "The AD closed
the wg."), then we can always manually submit the jabber log.
On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:48
Spencer Dawkins wrote:
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
I would like to see this, and if we expect it to happen, I'd suggest
automating it. Should be simple enough (assume IETF Pl
Scott Brim - le (m/j/a) 4/1/09 2:37 PM:
Excerpts from Dave CROCKER on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 11:43:29PM -0700:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
at their worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
email arc
Dear profesionals,
You may be just proposing a social security hole, I think.?An idea of
End-to-end is too primitive like monkey world. I recommend an idea of
family-to-family.
At first, a nation should be considered as a set of home, right? In other
words, as you may know, according to the th
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
I would like to see this, and if w
Excerpts from Dave CROCKER on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 11:43:29PM -0700:
> IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
> at their worst, each one isn't all that big.
>
> It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
> email archive, perhaps simply by sending the
Cullen,
I will respond to your comment on a high level. I think the
applicability statement on this document is correct and clear that this
will not work all the time. You seem to want to press the point that
there is no meaning for a mechanism unless it is always correct. I don't
agree with that
Dave CROCKER wrote:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
When I've chaired working groups I've found the
Jabber logs to be invaluable for help putting together
minutes, and occasionally for clarifying post-meeting
ques
Dear All;
Attached is a draft internet draft on end to end NAT.
As is discussed in draft-iab-ipv6-nat-00.txt:
If the
translation is reversible, and the translation is indeed reversed
by the time it reaches the other end of communication, then end-
to-end transparency
On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:43 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And
at their
worst, each one isn't all that big.
It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular
email archive,
perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list
Dave CROCKER wrote:
> IETF meeting jabber sessions often hold some very useful gems. And at
> their worst, each one isn't all that big.
>
> It occurs to me that we should try to fold them into the regular email
> archive, perhaps simply by sending the wg mailing list a copy afterwards?
makes sen
29 matches
Mail list logo
