On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:06:20PM -0700, The IESG wrote:
- 'Special Use IPv4 Addresses'
draft-iana-rfc3330bis-06.txt as an Informational RFC
It is worth documenting the changes to several allocations or assignments since
RFC 3330 and the draft does that well.
Here are some questions and
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07crocker.html?_r=1emc=eta1
Op-Ed Contributor
By STEPHEN D. CROCKER
Published: April 6, 2009
Bethesda, Md.
TODAY is an important date in the history of the Internet: the 40th anniversary
of what is known as the Request for Comments. Outside the
Today is the 40th Anniversary of the RFC, and Steve Crocker has
a piece on their birth in the New York Times :
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07crocker.html?_r=1
Regards
Marshall
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all,
I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area
directorate's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These
comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but
are copied to the document's authors for their
By the way, folks might also want to look at his earlier review of the origins,
provided as part of RFC 1000.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Steve,
Thanks for writing such a nice piece. I especially liked
As we rebuild our economy, I do hope we keep in mind the value
of openness, especially in industries that have rarely had it.
Did you ever actually get any comments on RFC1?
Brian
___
Brian,
Thanks. Re did anyone comment on RFC 1, I don't recall but it should
be easy to comb through the first several RFCs to see.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 7, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for writing such a nice piece.
On 4/7/09 10:26 AM, Peter Koch wrote:
10.0.0.0/8 - This block is set aside for use in private networks.
Its intended use is documented in [RFC1918]. Addresses within this
block SHOULD NOT appear on the public Internet and can be used
without any coordination with IANA or an
The IESG has received a request from the Integrated Security Model for
SNMP WG (isms) to consider the following document:
- 'Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Usage for Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Transport Models '
draft-ietf-isms-radius-usage-05.txt as a
10 matches
Mail list logo
