Janet,
Driving from Amsterdam is likely to be expensive - rental, fuel, and
parking are all pricey in Holland, and you run the risk of very long
traffic jams (605 kilometers total yesterday - about 3x the distance
from Amsterdam to Maastricht - a new record).
OTOH it's not far, and parts of it
On May 25, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
The Hague, largest room: 2161 (30 min by train from Schiphol + tram
or taxi)
http://www.worldforumcc.com/wfcc/uk/factsfigures_uk/capaciteitenov_uk.html
The Hague is easy to get to. I attended an ISOC meeting there last
fall, and
On May 26, 2009, at 8:07 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
'Internet Mail Architecture' draft-crocker-email-arch as a
Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a concern about the intended publication
status of this document and wishes to confirm the community's
preferences.
On May 27, 2009, at 20:40, Doug Otis wrote:
[...no way to...] remain compliant with any fixed architectural
concept
We might need a new document class, Best Current Architecture (kind
of the inverse of BCP).
Gruesse, Carsten
___
Ietf mailing
Overall, I like this document and support it going forward.
One thing it doesn't mention (and did come up when I was an AD) is the
following.
The goal of interoperability testing is to demonstrate that our
specifications are good. I.e., that the text in the final RFC is
complete and can be
I think this is also a good idea and will try to come up with
something for the next draft.
thanks,
Lisa
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Overall, I like this document and support it going forward.
One thing it doesn't mention (and did come up when I was
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for
this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve
these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document:
Thanks for the detailed review, Spencer! I'll set aside some time next week
to review your comments and then make necessary changes as needed in the
draft to address this in a -08 version.
Regards
Jason
On 5/27/09 9:55 PM, Spencer Dawkins spen...@wonderhamster.org wrote:
I have been selected
Given the recent discusion on travel to IETF78, I wanted to summarize
how the IAOC makes decisions on IETF meeting locations.
We first set the dates and general geographic location about three to
four years in advance. For example, the future meeting calendar at
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Dissemination of flow specification rules '
draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-09.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Ross Callon.
A URL of
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Nominating Committee Process: Earlier Announcement of Open Positions
and Solicitation of Volunteers'
draft-dawkins-nomcom-dont-wait-03.txt as a BCP
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
