I just *knew* it was a mistake to "Leave this thread for later ..."
On 3 Jul 2009, at 18:04, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 7/3/09 at 10:16 AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 3 jul 2009, at 0:35, Pete Resnick wrote:
A much better solution would be HTML, if it's sufficiently
constrained.
Or, ge
"Doug Ewell" writes:
> Douglas Otis wrote:
>
>> Reliance upon open source tools ensures the original RFCs and ID can
>> be maintained by others, without confronting unresolvable
>> compatibility issues.
>
> Whether a tool is open source or not has nothing to do with how many
> people know how to
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Already, above, Douglas pointed out for your comments correctly. RFC
format is different from a market share format by the purpose. Do you
have been think about the word "compatibility" and "standard"? Here is
IETF, not a market.. ;;
This thread has been headed down t
