On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Richard Stallman wrote:
Generally speaking, standards are useful, because they enable people
to converge what they are doing. But that ceases to be true when the
use of the standard is patented. It is better to have no standard
than have a standard that invites people i
Hi all,
As you know, one of the first tasks of the Nomcom is consideration of the
qualifications for the various positions. While the Nomcom is in the
initial stages of organization, we would appreciate community feedback on
the qualifications, as well as general feedback or concerns that you feel
RMS said:
"How should an SDO respond? I'm not sure. I'm only sure that I don't like
getting DoSed, either into dropping a standard or into
not implementing it for fear of infringing."
[BA] A bit of history. While this draft generalizes the notion of a TLS key
material exporters, the co
Many patents are filed for defensive reasons. Ie. If I don't patent it,
then someone else will, and then I won't be able to use the idea I came
up with. The other defensive reason is so that if company A tries to
sue company B for infringing patents, then company B can threaten to sue
company A b
> From: Richard Stallman
> Generally speaking, standards are useful, because they enable people to
> converge what they are doing. But that ceases to be true when the use of
> the standard is patented. It is better to have no standard than have a
> standard that invites people
Noah asked:
* Is there a default encoding for parameter values, or in fact any other part
of this header. I could not find anything in the draft which would indicate
there is a default. Could this cause problems?
Mark specifies link in terms of IRI [RFC 3987], as well as specifying that
Dear Mr. Kolkman,
We received your email inquiry about the status of ITU work on e164.arpa. Since
ITU-T SG 2 Counselor, Mr. Richard Hill is on vacation until next week, I'm
sorry I can not provide you an answer right now.
We will come back to you on this issue as soon as possible.
With my
If we are going to get that number up we need to have an application
layer interface that is 100% indifferent to the underlying network
version.
We seem to have slid backwards here. When the Web code was written it
was network agnostic. You could switch from TCP/IP to DECNETIV or OSI
by only chang
Hi Spencer,
Thanks very much for the detailed comments, we will address them after
IETF-75. We will also wait for the AD¹s direction before posting a new
version.
Thanks,
Yiu
On 7/24/09 2:51 PM, "Spencer Dawkins" wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
Earlier this month the IAB mailed IANA with a request to provide us plans:
http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence/2009-06-02-Roseman-Signing-by-IANA-of-ARPA.html
Thank you again for following up with IANA.
It looks like IANA has not yet signed .ar
Richard and all,
Open source software for some uses does provide for some
utility. By a opposite token, open source software for other
uses is an inhearent privacy and security risk for obvious reasons
so indeed such also misses the point. I am in favor of any Good
free software, but not a pro
I have never argued in favor of open source software.
I am a free software activist.
(See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html.)
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:29:22AM -0700, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> > Regarding hreflang - looking through the history, it's been discussed
> > in a fairly positive light a few times, but never made it in. I think
> > it does make some sense, since it's both in Atom and HTML.
>
> I think hreflang
d.b.nel...@comcast.net wrote:
> Yeah. I've always been a bit uncomfortable with the "security
> functionality" escape clause in the RADIUS Design Guidelines draft.
> Lots of things can reasonably be claimed to be "security related". I
> would have preferred the exception to be crafted a bit narr
Richard and all,
I agree largely. Very little software warrents patenting. Protection
of any authors software can much better and easily be done in other
ways. Open source is not the total answer either as some types of
software in open source format would be ill advised.
Richard Stallman wr
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:55:03PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> My understanding of HTML4 is that @lang identifies the language of the
> link text itself, not the title (although that may be a side effect),
> since it already has @hreflang. Do I have that wrong?
This attribute specifies the b
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:19:08AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> The *title parameter already allows for a language to be associated with
> the title. See RFC2231 and the examples in the link draft.
Of course, I should have spotted this.
I have two questions:
* Would it be harmful to mirror
The operative word here is uncertainty. A patent-holder creates
uncertainty. How should an SDO respond? I'm not sure. I'm only sure
that I don't like getting DoSed, either into dropping a standard or into
not implementing it for fear of infringing.
That's the nature of software
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:02:36AM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Sorry, that slipped through the cracks.
No problem!
I didn't want to be a pain, bringing it up so often.
> lang doesn't make any sense in this context; in HTML it applies to the
> link text, but there is none here.
>From the exm
Hey Mark,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:32:18PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I'm tracking proposed changes to -06 as a result of Last Call at:
> http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
I'm not sure how this process works, so please just say so if I'm getting the
wron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Alan" == Alan DeKok writes:
Alan> Both the PKM-SS-Cert and PKM-CA-Cert attributes provide
Alan> 'ad-hoc' extension of the RADIUS attribute size, much like the
Alan> EAP-Message attribute. It would have been preferable to
Back
On 27 jul 2009, at 16:29, Danny McPherson wrote:
The 0.01% they talk about is TRAFFIC, not USERS. And it's bogus
anyway.
Not that I want to have this discussion here again (folks should
revisit the archives)
This is what I had to say about it:
http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/08/re
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:02 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 27 jul 2009, at 9:43, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
This must mean that silently enabling IPv6 increases the number of
people for whom IPv6 works by a factor of around 100 (from <0.01%
in the general population
(http://asert.arbornetw
The IETF Last Call discussion of draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist
resulted in a healthy discussion with many people speaking. Some
people think that the open list is the right thing to do, but other
people want to redesign the entire NomCom process from a base set of
principles. This message su
Ooops. I sent this on the wrong thread. The
draft-dawkins-nomcom-dont-wait document is approved, and it is in the
RFC Editor queue. This message was about the
draft-dawkins-nomcom-openlist document. I'll resend this message on
the proper thread so that people will be able to locate it with
The IETF Last Call resulted in a healthy discussion with many people
speaking. Some people think that the open list is the right thing to
do, but other people want to redesign the entire NomCom process from
a base set of principles. This message summarizes my view of the
consensus following
On 27 jul 2009, at 9:43, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
This must mean that silently enabling IPv6 increases the number of
people for whom IPv6 works by a factor of around 100 (from <0.01% in
the general population
(http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/08/the-end-is-near-but-is-ipv6/
said <0.01%.
Where will they be posted?
Do I look for a message to IETF Discussion, or is there a web page
somewhere that will track these?
- Philip
On Mon, 27-Jul-09, at 03:49 , Morgan Sackett wrote:
Philip,
We will work on getting the files posted as soon as possible, it
should be within a day or t
All audio streams should be working now. If you are experiencing
issues, please do not hesitate to inform us. You can also get ahold
of us in the n...@jabber.ietf.org jabber room.
Morgan Sackett
VP of Engineering
VeriLAN Event Services, Inc.
215 SE Morrison Street
Portland, OR 97214
Tel:
Philip,
We will work on getting the files posted as soon as possible, it
should be within a day or two of the actual session.
Morgan
On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Philip Matthews wrote:
If one misses hearing a session live, will it be possible to listen
to the recording this week, or will
Jeroen Massar writes:
No, it is not "Native IPv6 over DSL" or any other form unfortunately.
You have to start thanking Microsoft for pushing 6to4 and especially
Teredo, having it automatically on new platforms and having clients
like uTorrent auto-enable it on install for those that don't.
u
31 matches
Mail list logo
