Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... Lou On 9/4/2009 7:32 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Lou, > > Does that online rate you saw include in-room Internet, service > charges, and taxes? Those are included in the IETF rate. > > Cheers, > Andy > > On

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

Lou, Does that online rate you saw include in-room Internet, service charges, and taxes? Those are included in the IETF rate. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > Out of curiosity, why is the IETF rate ~2000Y higher than their standard > internet room rate (try to bo

Re: IETF Trust response to the appeal by John C Klensin (July 18, 2009

Without taking positions on the specifics of the appeal or the response, I have to say that my take on the response is that it doesn't properly address the appeal and is inadequate. I would have expected the specific issues raised in the appeal to be responded to in a direct manner, with a clear r

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the > same results... I don't understand why the rate during another period is relevant to the rate we might get. Remember that hotels, like everyone else, charge more w

Re: IETF Trust response to the appeal by John C Klensin (July 18, 2009

The entire response has been posted to the tlp-interest list Why wasn't it send to the ISS? It may be easier ... Please copy the response to the IETF list Thanks ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... I don't understand why the rate during another period is relevant to the rate we might get. Remember

RE: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshimavenue?)

David Morris wrote: || On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Andrew Sullivan wrote: || ||| On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... ||| ||| I don't understand why the rate during another period is rel

The methodology/guideline of mathematical re-definition of constitution or legal/law

Dear experts, A protocol is a kinds of law. I've just found out the new conceptual methodology/guideline for mathematical re-definition of constitution or legal/law. How do you think? I Request for comments. PEOPLE ARE CONSIDERING THE RESULT OF TODAY, FOR SEEKING THE ANSWER OF NEXT DAY. Th