Hi -
> From: "jean-michel bernier de portzamparc"
> To: "internet users contributing group"
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 3:48 PM
> Subject: IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
...
> le:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5Cjfcm%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtmlclip1%5C01%5Cclip=
...
It's interesting what leaks out of s
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:37 AM, The IESG wrote:
>
> > The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
> > (tls) to consider the following document:
> >
> > - 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension '
> >as a Proposed Standard
>
>
> I support thi
Dave CROCKER writes:
> They think v6 is not ready for production use?
Production quality is one thing, headline-worthy selling point is another.
Arnt
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
At 18:31 06/12/2009, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 07:51:18AM -0500, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> under IDNA2008 rules on a registry by registry basis (I mean registry
>> in its >> most general sense, not just TLD)
>
> The overwhelming majority of DNS operat
http://iucg.org/wiki/BUD-IDNA2010
The WG/IDNABIS work being conducted on IDNA2008 (i.e. the new standard for
Internationalized Domain Names) is now completed. As committed, the IUCG
plans to publish an "IDNA2010 Best Usage Document" in order to explain to
users how to best take advantage from th
On Nov 30, 2009, at 7:37 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
(tls) to consider the following document:
- 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension '
as a Proposed Standard
I support this draft.
--
Steve Checko
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:37:21AM +, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:02:53PM +, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Nico,
> >>
> >>Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >>
> >>
> 13.3. Additional Recommendations
>
> If the application
Eran, to my knowledge there is no relationship between the two
registries, besides some overlap. The registry you mention appears to
be just hash function names and references a few X.509 RFCs. I don't
know about the history but it seems to be a more generic list. (We
reference that registry in dr
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Should you wish to rent a colocated
server in Germany, Strago AG wishes to inform you that its servers are
powerful, inexpensive and support IPv6 (beta).
They think v6 is not ready for production use?
well, it does say 'be
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Should you wish to rent a colocated
server in Germany, Strago AG wishes to inform you that its servers are
powerful, inexpensive and support IPv6 (beta).
They think v6 is not ready for production use?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
Is this part of their 'v6 in the cloud' As-A-Service?
On 12/7/09, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Today, for the first time, I saw an ad in a mass-market magazine that
> cited IPv6 support as a feature. Should you wish to rent a colocated
> server in Germany, Strago AG wishes to inform you that its ser
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:02:53PM +, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi Nico,
Nicolas Williams wrote:
13.3. Additional Recommendations
If the application requires security layers then it MUST prefer the
SASL "GSSAPI" mechanism over "GS2-KRB5" or "GS2-KRB5-PLUS".
Today, for the first time, I saw an ad in a mass-market magazine that
cited IPv6 support as a feature. Should you wish to rent a colocated
server in Germany, Strago AG wishes to inform you that its servers are
powerful, inexpensive and support IPv6 (beta).
Arnt
* Chris Newman:
> This the most time-sensitive and security-critical IETF draft with
> respect to impact on the Internet community that I have seen in 17
> years of IETF participation.
Standard vendor response is to disable broken protocol features. This
has been done countless times for core pr
14 matches
Mail list logo
