Joe Abley writes:
I'm saying that the body that administers the root zone is not the
IETF. Not being a policy person I don't have any specific fears, but
I'll observe that the set of people who make policy that affects
administration of the root zone has a fairly small intersection with
the
John Levine writes:
If other people agree that it's a good idea to have a place that IANA
can point to for the reserved names, I'd be happy to move this ahead.
Or if we think the situation is OK as it is, we can forget about it.
I'd be happier with some sort of list (I was surprised by its
I seem to have a problem with short words this week (can, to etc.).
They spontanteously mutate or disappear. Sorry.
Arnt
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
I think that in regards to the management and supervision of
.ARPA I'd suggest to include RFC3172 and RFC2860 as a reference.
I find that using the word Registry will IMHO create some
confusion with ICANNland.
The list of reserved names from ICANN's DAGv3 2.1.1.2 you
included in your message
Haai,
[not replying to anyone in particular]
I think we should make and maintain a seperation between two classes of
(reserved) symbols according to their fundamentally different origins:
-Required for one or more protocols to correctly function; and
-Reserved for administrative purposes (which
At 05:38 28/12/2009, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
John Levine writes:
If other people agree that it's a good idea to have a place that
IANA can point to for the reserved names, I'd be happy to move this
ahead. Or if we think the situation is OK as it is, we can forget about it.
I'd be happier
On Dec 28, 2009, at 3:38 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
I'd be happier with some sort of list (I was surprised by its length, and IMO
that's a sign that the list is needed) and like your document.
+1
I can think of all sorts of other use cases for such a list, such as verifying
the accuracy of
. A
stable URI for the TLP effective 28 December, 2009 is
http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy-20091228.pdf .
The new document updating the Trust Legal Provisions was approved by the
Trustees after a consideration of last call comments in a telechat on
December 17, 2009, subject
On 28 Dec 2009 01:16:47 -
John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Here's their reserved list:
...
LOCALHOST
This one caught my eye, as I know for sure that localhost.tld seems
to be registered in most TLDs (both gTLDs and ccTLDs) by actual users
(mostly because I recently looked into purchasing
Here's their reserved list:
...
LOCALHOST
This one caught my eye, as I know for sure that localhost.tld seems
to be registered in most TLDs (both gTLDs and ccTLDs) by actual users
(mostly because I recently looked into purchasing one such domain).
ICANN reserves LOCALHOST as a TLD, not as a
[ re _proto and _service names ]
See:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gudmundsson-dnsext-srv-clarify-00.txt
and older version of that is being split (second half is to contain the
registry cleanups).
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gudmundsson-dns-srv-iana-registry-04
Yes, I noticed that. As far
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
...
This message is to announce that the IETF Trustees have adopted
on a new version of the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP), to be effective 28
December, 2009. The Grace period for old-boilerplate will begin on that
date,
and last through 1 February, 2010.
...
So, unless
Since underscore labels are not considered normal DNS labels
for domains representing (roughly) physical hosts and networks,
everything below the topmost underscore label should not need
to go in a central repository for underscore labels but be
pointed to by the documentation referenced for the
Julian == Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de writes:
Julian Marshall Eubanks wrote:
... This message is to announce that the IETF Trustees have
adopted on a new version of the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP), to
be effective 28 December, 2009. The Grace period for
On 2009-12-29 16:02, Sam Hartman wrote:
Julian == Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de writes:
Julian Marshall Eubanks wrote:
... This message is to announce that the IETF Trustees have
adopted on a new version of the Trust Legal Provisions (TLP), to
be effective 28
. A
stable URI for the TLP effective 28 December, 2009 is
http://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF-Trust-License-Policy-20091228.pdf .
The new document updating the Trust Legal Provisions was approved by the
Trustees after a consideration of last call comments in a telechat on
December 17, 2009, subject
16 matches
Mail list logo
