Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement

2010-03-04 Thread Edward Lewis
During IETF 77, meeting March 21-26 in Anaheim, there will be a Bar BOF held to discuss the following work items: 1. Extensions to EPP as it exists today 2. Requirements for EPPbis 3. Requirements for the submission of DNSSEC's DS record into the registration system The Bar BOF will be on th

Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement

2010-03-04 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Edward Lewis wrote: > > 1. Extensions to EPP as it exists today > 2. Requirements for EPPbis > 3. Requirements for the submission of DNSSEC's DS record into the > registration system > [...] > DNSSEC generates data that must be transferred from one management zone to > another.

Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement

2010-03-04 Thread Edward Lewis
At 15:42 + 3/4/10, Tony Finch wrote: On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Edward Lewis wrote: 1. Extensions to EPP as it exists today 2. Requirements for EPPbis 3. Requirements for the submission of DNSSEC's DS record into the registration system [...] DNSSEC generates data that must be transferred f

Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement

2010-03-04 Thread Tony Finch
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Edward Lewis wrote: > > Plain DNS does too. DNSSEC makes the problem more painful, but that does > > not mean the scope should be limited to DS records. > > That will probably come up in the discussion. But so far no one on the "would > make use of this" side of the discussion

Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement

2010-03-04 Thread Edward Lewis
At 16:54 + 3/4/10, Tony Finch wrote: Even if the regi*s don't, there are plenty of delegation points lower in the DNS that could make use of more automation. It's possible that we are talking about two different problem domains. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat (Asymmetric Key Packages) to Proposed Standard

2010-03-04 Thread Cullen Jennings
I was just looking at this draft and thinking about the IANA registration for the application/pkcs8 media type. Right now that registration is in draft-ietf-sip-certs draft which this draft references. When you think about it for a minute, it make no sense to define that mime type in a SIP dra

Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat

2010-03-04 Thread Sean Turner
Alfred � wrote: At Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:36:03 -0700, Cullen Jennings wrote: I was just looking at this draft and thinking about the IANA registration for the application/pkcs8 media type. Right now that registration is in draft-ietf-sip-certs draft which this draft references. When you think ab

Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

2010-03-04 Thread Thomas Narten
Total of 73 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Mar 5 00:53:02 EST 2010 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 10.96% |8 | 7.28% |39901 | mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp 8.22% |6 | 7.40% |40545 | w