Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes

On a second thought, why don't we change the angle of this subject? Nowadays, dual ISP are pretty common. I may have a cable from Verizon broadband and a wireless connection from AT&T at the same time. Now suppose I want to run a bandwidth-demanding online service, OnLive f

Re: Above market hotel room rates

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/03/25/science/AP-US-NASA-Pricey-Snacks.html ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

T-shirts?

Ray, I was asked about 5-6 times this week whether you would be selling the famed IETF74 "rock concert" style shirt. Of course I enthusiastically answered "Yes!" But then they wanted to know when. Do you have time table for the online availability? Gregory -- Sent from my mobile device IE

Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII

Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:55:56PM -0800, Bob Braden wrote: > > > Drafts. That always seemed counter-productive to me. I am not sure I > > would characterize the problem as "serious", but it does seem t o warp > > common sense for the sake of bureaucratic uniformit

Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard

Hi Brian, Larry and others >From an implementation point of view in the RIPE Database, I have no preference if this is in the ROUTE(6) or INET(6)NUM object. From a practical point of view, it seems to be more related to a route than address information. Even if it is not strictly routing policy.

Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC

Erik, This paragraph talks about the requirements of the routing protocols, not about the need for routers to move around: Routing protocols running on a router may exhibit different requirements for uniqueness of interface addresses; some have no such requirements, others have require

Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC

On 03/26/10 11:04 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: Erik, First of all, the document is *an* addressing model for ad hoc networks. It does not claim to be the only model. For instance, during working group discussions it also became apparent that link local addresses could also be employed, albeit -- as sta

Registration Operations Mail List

As an outcome of a meeting of approximately 40 registration operators on March 24, 2010 (coincident with IETF 77) a new mail list has been established for the discussion of Internet Registration Operations activities. The kinds of operators that may be interested in the discussions on this li

Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC

Erik, First of all, the document is *an* addressing model for ad hoc networks. It does not claim to be the only model. For instance, during working group discussions it also became apparent that link local addresses could also be employed, albeit -- as stated in the document -- the working gr

Re: Above market hotel room rates

On 3/26/2010 8:50 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:36:12AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote a message of 48 lines which said: When you book a hotel as part of a large group like this, you are effectively participating in a futures market. Fascinating discuss

Re: Above market hotel room rates

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:36:12AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote a message of 48 lines which said: > When you book a hotel as part of a large group like this, you are > effectively participating in a futures market. Fascinating discussion. I learned a lot, including the fact that IETFers are e