Yoav Nir wrote:
Who's "folks"? A lot of people come to an IETF meeting, and are
> only following one or two of the working groups. That does not mean
> that they sit in their hotel rooms for the rest of the meeting.
> Instead, they pick what looks like interesting meetings, and go
> there, with
On Jul 31, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> At 9:32 AM -0800 7/30/10, Melinda Shore wrote:
>>
>>> The implication that there needs to be a session, with a room
>>> and slides and humans sitting in chairs, kind of suggests that
>>> people who want to participate in the IETF have to a
> At 9:32 AM -0800 7/30/10, Melinda Shore wrote:
>
>>The implication that there needs to be a session, with a room
>>and slides and humans sitting in chairs, kind of suggests that
>>people who want to participate in the IETF have to attend
>>meetings.
>
> "participate" is too strong a word. Schedul
I saw proposals for two pools from which nomcom members might be chosen. I
don't think that anyone is proposing that once chosen, there is any distinction
between the 10 voting nomcom members. When I was a liaison to nomcom, it seemed
to me that the ten voting members acted as peers, with no one
