Once upon a time Bob Braden would alternate WG sessions, one "open" and then
one only for people who were actually contributing.
On Jul 31, 2010 7:00 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote:
> At 9:32 AM -0800 7/30/10, Melinda Shore wrote:
>
>>The implication that there needs to be a session, with a room
Throwing a draft at the IETF without a lot of supporting work rarely gets
anywhere, but some people find it hard to figure out just what "supporting"
work is actually effective and to execute on it. It's the non-procedural
parts of the IETF process that confound people, and lead to various end
runs
As someone who is involved in eduroam, I'm curious how many people found the
availability of eduroam at IETF 78 useful.
If you believe that you are eligible to use eduroam - irrespective of whether
you tried it at IETF 78 - please consider completing the form at the following
URL (it's only thr
Hi Phillip,
You can find all you want to know at the website: http://www.eduroam.org,
especially the Service Definition at:
http://www.eduroam.org/downloads/docs/GN2-07-327v2-DS5_1_1-_eduroam_Service_Definition.pdf
you may also want to watch the cartoon at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVCm
Or why not go further and reorganize IETF completely on the same lines
as most other standards bodies.
IETF would be split into intensive one or two day working groups in
which the WG was expected to make significant progress on closing out
its issues list.
Wednesday would be set aside for the tu
Nah, a working group of last resort is when you create your own
standards organization to work on it.
Or in some cases that is a first resort. I find it rather amusing to
find the number of such efforts that were started with the idea that
they had to move faster than the existing standards orgs c
On Jul 30, 2010, at 14:54, Jari Arkko wrote:
> people consistently referring to the meetings as "BOFs",
The fix is to call the formal working group formation planning meetings
"working group formation planning meetings", not to stop calling the literal
BoF meetings "BoFs". A lot of conference
And nowhere is it noticed that cyber crooks are attacking the
insecurity of the banking system, not the Internet at all really
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Jul 2010, at 08:25, Jorge Amodio wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100729/tc_afp/usitinternetsoftwarecrimeicannblackhat
I guess the n
Hi,
I have some comments about this draft.
section 3.2. Adjacency Establishment and Maintenance
Whenever ISIS_BFD_REQUIRED is TRUE the following extensions to the
rules for adjacency establishment and maintenance MUST apply:
o ISIS_NEIGHBOR_USEABLE MUST be TRUE before the adja
