I support the effort, but not the timing.
Maybe having an hour reserved at each end of the day for BoFs would be a
compromise (just an idea popping right now).
> -Message d'origine-
> De : ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de
> Henk Uijterwaal
> Envoyé : lun
I think having the BOFs early in the week is a good idea but I'd modify
the proposal a bit.
Background: At this meeting, we have 8 BOFs. There are also 7 or 8
meetings in each of the sessions (9-11:30, 1-3, 3-4).
Scheduling all 8 BOFs at the same time will maximize overlap between them
but oth
>> Hmm. How many non-overlapping time slots? It would be extremely
>> frustrating if there was a lot of overlap between BOFs. Some of us
>> are interested in almost any new topic. My first reaction is to prefer
>> the BOFs spread out. I'm not sure that concentrating them will reduce
>> the problem
Dear Colleagues
We have arranged for transcription for this evenings plenary session.
Please consider this a best-effort service as our regular transcriptionist is
not able to join she will be transcribing by following the audio feed remotely.
We will project the transcripts on screens on th
Are office hours on the wiki?
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 2010-11-8, at 11:32, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> the TSV area "office hours" are Tue 15:20-17:00 in Diamond 3.
Correction: Diamond *** 2 ***
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
ht
-Original Message-
From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of NomCom Chair
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:51 PM
To: IETF Announcement list
Subject: NomCom 2010-2011: Announcing Beijing Office Hours for IETF-79
Nomcom is pleased to anno
One of the factors that frequently determines the outcome of a piece
of work is how it is broken down into parts. So the scope of WGs in
formation can be the most significant factor in determining what they
produce.
Putting the BOFs at a known time would be very helpful for that
reason. Having the
Maybe for the experiment we should also move the Social to Friday
evening: 1) it won't interfere with IP meeting time; 2) less people so
better chance of getting a ticket; 3) more folks will stay for Friday
meetings; 4) IETF meeting will be over so we can let our hair down -
oops that's not a probl
Hi,
the TSV area "office hours" are Tue 15:20-17:00 in Diamond 3.
If you plan on stopping by, please send us (tsv-...@tools.ietf.org) a quick
email beforehand.
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf
On 11/8/10 10:57 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2010-11-08 15:26, The IESG wrote:
First, schedule all BOFs for Monday afternoon.
Hmm. How many non-overlapping time slots? It would be extremely
frustrating if there was a lot of overlap between BOFs. Some of us
are interested in almost any ne
On 2010-11-08 15:26, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling experiment. The
> goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and also provide
> more time to craft BOF proposals.
>
> The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, schedule all BOFs
On 11/08/2010 10:26 GMT+08:00, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling experiment. The
> goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and also provide
> more time to craft BOF proposals.
>
> The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, schedul
On 11/8/2010 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, schedule all BOFs
for Monday afternoon. Second, schedule WGs before we know which BOFs will
be held. Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
proposal to ADs.
Please let us know wheth
If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that make the
attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest?
On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling experiment. The
goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner a
The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling experiment. The
goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and also provide
more time to craft BOF proposals.
The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, schedule all BOFs
for Monday afternoon. Second, schedule WGs be
On Nov 8, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -- Thomas Jefferson
>
> It is also the price for maintaining quality and culture. -- D. Crocker
>
>
>
> One of the problems with having things work well is that we get complacent.
>
> Onc
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -- Thomas Jefferson
It is also the price for maintaining quality and culture. -- D. Crocker
One of the problems with having things work well is that we get complacent.
Once we get through the challenges of gaining approval for a documen
Hi all,
Mark McGloin and me have been working on OAuth 2.0 security
considerations for a couple of weeks now. Since we both cannot attend
the IETF-79 meetings, we would like to provide the WG with information
regarding the current status of our work. I therefore uploaded a
_preliminary_ versi
Hi all,
please consider attending the following two meetings!
** OAuth Security Session **
• Date: Monday, 13:00-15:00
• Location: IAB breakout room (Jade 2)
• Contact: Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
The security consideration section of OAuth 2.0 (draft -1
Hi Eric,
Sorry for the delay. Please see below:
At this point, I believe the only change that is needed to draft-ietf-mpls-
ldp-upstream is to move the reference to RFC 3472 into the "Informational
References" section.
This is fine. I will make the change in the next update.
That is, I
21 matches
Mail list logo
