I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like
At 14:04 22-11-10, The IAOC wrote:
As part of the IAOC presentation in Beijing, I said that the IAOC will be
making a decision on Day Passes in the middle of December. I would like
your feedback on the Day Pass experiment.
[snip]
Possible reasons to discontinue offering Day Passes:
-
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Authentication-Results Registration For Vouch By Reference Results'
draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
Section 3 says TLS clients MUST NOT send SSL 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO messages.
and TLS servers MUST NOT negotiate or use SSL 2.0 and later TLS servers
that do not support SSL 2.0 MAY accept version 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO messages as
the first message of a TLS handshake for interoperability with old clients.
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Authentication-Results Registration For Vouch By Reference Results'
draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
(tls) to consider the following document:
- 'Prohibiting SSL Version 2.0'
draft-ietf-tls-ssl2-must-not-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this
Dear Colleagues,
The IAB intends to publish Evolution of the IP Model
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iab-ip-model-evolution-02.txt
This document attempts to document various aspects of the IP service
model and how it has evolved over time. In particular, it attempts
to document the
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: re...@ietf.org
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/renum/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/renum
Description: Site renumbering is sometimes unavoidable, but remains very
hard and impractical for
The IESG has received a request from the Message Organization WG (morg)
to consider the following document:
- 'IMAP LIST extension for special-use mailboxes'
draft-ietf-morg-list-specialuse-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
