Hello all,
There have been a discussion on tsvwg mailing list about old transport
layer protocols - exactly IRTP (RFC938), RDP (RFC908,1151) and NETBLT
(RFC998). Initially there have been proposed to define IANA
considerations for them. But after a discussion it was found out that it
would be
Hi Bernard,
Thank for the review. Comments in line below:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> There are two major issues remaining in this document.
>
> One issue is that in a number of places, the document appears to
> contradict IETF standards track documents.
>
> Example
> From: Yoav Nir
> Sigh.
> You'd think they would have learned by now.
"Experience is a dear master, but fools will learn at no other."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 'Poor Richard's Almanac'
Noel
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https
>Wow. Less than a week, and the special rate for the block is already
>unavailable. I've reserved a room at 5600 CZK per night (about $300US),
>but I don't think I can keep that reservation (I'd have a hard time
>getting it reimbursed).
I just followed the link from the IETF web site and it off
On 12/30/10 6:15 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote:
Registration will open the beginning of next week with the usual hotel details,
etc.
Ray
Wow. Less than a week, and the special rate for the block is already
unavailable. I've reserved a room at 5600 CZK per night (about $300US),
but I don't think
Yoav Nir wrote:
> You'd think they would have learned by now.
>
> "A native IPv6 network will restore end-to-end connectivity
> with a vastly expanded address space..."
That's true but the problem is that the end to end connectivity
is utterly lost during the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 network
>This seems like a document that might interest some on this list...
It's not bad, but it's basically a well written summary of the
conventional wisdom about IPv6. As we all know, some of the
conventional wisdom is more grounded in reality, some less.
>> Last week the FCC released a new working
Sigh.
You'd think they would have learned by now.
"A native IPv6 network will restore end-to-end connectivity with a vastly
expanded address space..."
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
This seems like a document that might interest some on this list...
From: "Robert Cannon
This seems like a document that might interest some on this list...From: "Robert Cannon" Date: January 5, 2011 11:24:51 AM ESTSubject: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released
Last week the FCC released a new working paper Potential Impacts on Communications From IPv4 Exhausti
Just as a reminder, if any of you are thinking of proposing new IETF
work: the deadline for BOF proposals for the next meeting is January
31st. But if you have something in mind, please talk to your ADs as soon
as possible. More information at
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2011.html#IET
Done:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-13.txt
The diff from -12 is here:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-13
Peter
On 1/3/11 4:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I just realized that we never replied publicly. Jeff and I had a ph
11 matches
Mail list logo