Old transport-layer protocols to Historic?

2011-01-05 Thread Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Hello all, There have been a discussion on tsvwg mailing list about old transport layer protocols - exactly IRTP (RFC938), RDP (RFC908,1151) and NETBLT (RFC998). Initially there have been proposed to define IANA considerations for them. But after a discussion it was found out that it would be

Re: Review of draft-zorn-radius-keywrap

2011-01-05 Thread Joe Salowey
Hi Bernard, Thank for the review. Comments in line below: On Dec 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > There are two major issues remaining in this document. > > One issue is that in a number of places, the document appears to > contradict IETF standards track documents. > > Example

Re: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released

2011-01-05 Thread Noel Chiappa
> From: Yoav Nir > Sigh. > You'd think they would have learned by now. "Experience is a dear master, but fools will learn at no other." -- Benjamin Franklin, 'Poor Richard's Almanac' Noel ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https

Re: Question about Prague

2011-01-05 Thread John Levine
>Wow. Less than a week, and the special rate for the block is already >unavailable. I've reserved a room at 5600 CZK per night (about $300US), >but I don't think I can keep that reservation (I'd have a hard time >getting it reimbursed). I just followed the link from the IETF web site and it off

Re: Question about Prague

2011-01-05 Thread Adam Roach
On 12/30/10 6:15 AM, Ray Pelletier wrote: Registration will open the beginning of next week with the usual hotel details, etc. Ray Wow. Less than a week, and the special rate for the block is already unavailable. I've reserved a room at 5600 CZK per night (about $300US), but I don't think

Re: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released

2011-01-05 Thread Masataka Ohta
Yoav Nir wrote: > You'd think they would have learned by now. > > "A native IPv6 network will restore end-to-end connectivity > with a vastly expanded address space..." That's true but the problem is that the end to end connectivity is utterly lost during the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 network

Re: Fwd: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released

2011-01-05 Thread John Levine
>This seems like a document that might interest some on this list... It's not bad, but it's basically a well written summary of the conventional wisdom about IPv6. As we all know, some of the conventional wisdom is more grounded in reality, some less. >> Last week the FCC released a new working

Re: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released

2011-01-05 Thread Yoav Nir
Sigh. You'd think they would have learned by now. "A native IPv6 network will restore end-to-end connectivity with a vastly expanded address space..." On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:56 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote: This seems like a document that might interest some on this list... From: "Robert Cannon

Fwd: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released

2011-01-05 Thread Richard L. Barnes
This seems like a document that might interest some on this list...From: "Robert Cannon" Date: January 5, 2011 11:24:51 AM ESTSubject: FCC IPv6 Working Paper Released Last week the FCC released a new working paper Potential Impacts on Communications From IPv4 Exhausti

time to act on IETF-80 BOFs

2011-01-05 Thread Jari Arkko
Just as a reminder, if any of you are thinking of proposing new IETF work: the deadline for BOF proposals for the next meeting is January 31st. But if you have something in mind, please talk to your ADs as soon as possible. More information at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2011.html#IET

Re: [certid] Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-12

2011-01-05 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
Done: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-13.txt The diff from -12 is here: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-13 Peter On 1/3/11 4:14 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I just realized that we never replied publicly. Jeff and I had a ph