I've made this change in our working copy.
On 2011-1-21, at 14:50, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> t.petch skrev 2011-01-21 12:43:
>> I would like to see more clarity in 8.1
>> " For assignments done through IETF-published RFCs, the Contact will be the
>> IESG."
>> in that I am unclear what IETF-publi
[More NOISE, skip reading if you want SIGNAL]
On Jan 24, 2011, at 5:36 AM, Christian Huitema wrote:
>> Wasn't the official definition of the meter also tied to Paris?
>
> The invention of the meter is indeed tied to Paris. The value of the meter
> itself is not.
>
> The meter was defined by
On 01/24/11 05:35, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message , Phil
lip Hallam-Baker writes:
Sure people can do this, but what is the point?
Let us imagine that as a matter of national policy we are all to live in
smaller houses to save energy. In what respect would such a policy be
realized if everyon
I was appointed to review this document from an OPS-DIR point of
vie, i,e, to check for operational or management aspects.
This are is not my space of expertise, so don't rely too much on my
report.
I think that there might be some operational aspects in the sense that
sometimes secure/encrypted
