* Stuart Cheshire wrote:
>On my 30-inch displays your hard-wrapped text appears as a thin
>narrow ribbon of text no matter how wide the window is, and on my
>phone your hard-wrapped lines are too long to fit so they get re-
>wrapped to that charming long/short/long/short pattern so
>characte
The Internet Society, on behalf of the IETF Administrative Oversight
Committee (IAOC), announces this Request for Proposals for a legal service
provider. The successful bidder will enter into a contract with the
Internet Society.
The legal services provider (Provider) will provide advice to the I
This protocol has established a legacy base, as in it is going to be a part of
the infrastructure we have to work round for decades even if Apple abandon it
tomorrow.
It is now futile to attempt modification of the protocol except in limited ways
that do not impact the legacy base.
Therefore
IETF standards should never attempt to solve a technical issue by changing
human behavior.
It is futile. And it suggests that the dvelopers are more important than users.
This is a bug in the technology. Fix it.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 15, 2011, at 13:32, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Stuar
On Feb 18, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> This protocol has established a legacy base, as in it is going to be a part
> of the infrastructure we have to work round for decades even if Apple abandon
> it tomorrow.
>
> It is now futile to attempt modification of the protocol exc
Steve,
By what time will this sprint be over do you think?
> -Original Message-
> From: 80all-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:80all-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> IETF Chair
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:32 PM
> To: IETF Announcement list
> Cc: 80...@ietf.org; IETF
> Subject: [80all]
Update: I looked at the diffs for version 20, and I think the discussion below
accurately reflect the changes--so please consider this a followup review of
version 20.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. I haven't had a chance to look
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:46:52AM -0800, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
> I have a proposal in at the moment, CAA. I have a party that is going to
> release code before Prague. The expert review should take six weeks, it has
> taken twice that.
I want to apologize here, publicly to Phillip
Hello,
As far as I know there was a request to review URI schemes defined in
this document on uri-review list on 1 March 2010. There were a few
responses on it, but I'd like to comment these schemes' registration
now, during the Last Call.
See my comments in-line.
9.3. Conference O
Hello,
Let me briefly comment IANA considerations sub-sections, that define two
registries.
See my comments in-line.
12.5. CCMP Protocol Registry
This document requests that the IANA create a new registry for the
CCMP protocol including an initial registry for operation typ
10 matches
Mail list logo
