Re: My comments to the press about OAM for MPLS

2011-03-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-03-03 05:02, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > >> I want the whole community to be aware of the comments that I made to the >> press over the past few days. Last Friday, the ITU-T Study Group 15 decided >> to move forward with an OAM solution t

Re: Review on draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks-03

2011-03-02 Thread Rajeev Koodli
Hi Tina, Thanks for the review. On 3/1/11 8:25 AM, "Tina TSOU" wrote: > Comment #1 > In section 3.1, "Delaying the public IPv4 address exhaustion involves > assigning private IPv4 addressing for end-users, as well as extending an > IPv4 address (with the use of extended port ranges). > >>> d

Review on draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks-03

2011-03-02 Thread Tina Tsou
Comment #1 In section 3.1, "Delaying the public IPv4 address exhaustion involves assigning private IPv4 addressing for end-users, as well as extending an IPv4 address (with the use of extended port ranges). >> do you mean using some solution like address + port (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-y

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Dave CROCKER
On 3/2/2011 6:03 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: Tony, Dave, On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:59 +, Tony Finch wrote: On 1 Mar 2011, at 18:56, Dave CROCKER wrote: If you all promise to keep in mind that it is only a /very/ rough and formative effort, please take a look at:

Re: Request for review of draft-yevstifeyev-genarea-historic-03

2011-03-02 Thread Eliot Lear
Thank you for the opportunity to review this draft. I do so merely as an individual. It might be a good idea to provide some additional clarity on when to market something Historic, but your document requires a bit of clarity on its own as to what your motivating logic is. Why, for instance, do

Request for review of draft-yevstifeyev-genarea-historic-03

2011-03-02 Thread Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Hello all, Please review and provide the feedback on /draft-yevstifeyev-genarea-historic-03/, that may be found at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-genarea-historic-03 The brief description of the document: (Draft's abstract) This document defined what the Historic RFC maturity

Re: My comments to the press about OAM for MPLS

2011-03-02 Thread Marshall Eubanks
On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > I want the whole community to be aware of the comments that I made to the > press over the past few days. Last Friday, the ITU-T Study Group 15 decided > to move forward with an OAM solution that is incompatible with the work being > done in

My comments to the press about OAM for MPLS

2011-03-02 Thread Russ Housley
I want the whole community to be aware of the comments that I made to the press over the past few days. Last Friday, the ITU-T Study Group 15 decided to move forward with an OAM solution that is incompatible with the work being done in the IETF MPLS WG. This is a breach of the agreement reache

Re: conformance languages (issue 278), was: Last Call: (Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)) to Proposed Stan

2011-03-02 Thread Julian Reschke
On 01.03.2011 17:00, Barry Leiba wrote: I agree that this needs tuning; but I'd rather not invent a new keyword for that. Sensible. The appendix D () isn't meant to be normative; thus I believe leaving it

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Shane Kerr
Tony, Dave, On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:59 +, Tony Finch wrote: > On 1 Mar 2011, at 18:56, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > > If you all promise to keep in mind that it is only a /very/ rough > > and formative effort, please take a look at: > > > > This seems like th

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Shane Kerr
Joel, On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 12:49 -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > in v6ops ops we have documents like: > > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jankiewicz-v6ops-v4v6biblio-03.txt Cool, this is actually the document I was looking for when I started this thread - even if it doesn't have the logging recomme

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Shane Kerr
Andrew, On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 07:29 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > > > FWIW, this came up in the dnsext working group a few years ago. In the > > end, I don't think anything was done, which is kind of a shame. > > Nothing was done f

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:34:53PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote a message of 50 lines which said: > In my mind a "road map" tells you where something is going: May be in english :-) but in IETFspeak, "roadmap" has already been used several times for "list of relevant RFC on a given subject, with c

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Shane Kerr
Bob, I'm not sure. In my mind a "road map" tells you where something is going: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_roadmap I am kind of looking for where we are now, and possibly where we have been. -- Shane On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:34 -0800, Bob Braden wrote: > A few years ago some of us

ICANN Leadership Positions open.

2011-03-02 Thread Henk Uijterwaal
Resent on behalf of the ICANN Nomcom, sorry for any duplicates. Apply now for ICANN's Leadership Positions: Introducing the Nominating Committee (NomCom) The NomCom is an independent committee that, over a three-year cycle, is responsible for the selection and appointment of half of the voting

Re: Where to find IETF recommendations?

2011-03-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:34:19AM -0800, Bob Braden wrote a message of 29 lines which said: > A few years ago some of us tried to interest the IETF in producing > "road maps" for all the major protocols/protocol families. As a > worked example, we produced a roadmap for TCP. It seems to me t