On Mar 16, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
To make clear which documents were issued under the original regime
and which were issued under the new, there should probably be
an obvious gap in the number range (going to 5 digit or 6 digit numbers).
Oh, have you any guess how many
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04
-Original Message-
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:26 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org
Cc: General Area Review Team; The IETF
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04
I am the assigned Gen-ART
On 3/15/2011 4:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
That's why my personal preference is what I already suggested -
just label them all as Internet Standard.
Classifying specs as full standards, when there is no evidence that the criteria
for Full are satisfied, is a good way to instantly
Greetings!
We're two weeks out from the beginning of meeting streaming. For those
interested in monitoring sessions or participating remotely the following
information may prove useful.
- -Audio Streaming-
All 8 parallel tracks at the IETF 80 meeting will be broadcast starting with
the
All 8 parallel tracks at the IETF 80 meeting will be broadcast
starting with the commencement of working group sessions on Monday,
November 28, 2011 at 0900 CET (GMT+1) and continue until Friday,
April 1 at 1515 CET.
Wow, six months of streaming. Maybe you meant March 28th.
More to the point,
On 3/16/11 3:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
All 8 parallel tracks at the IETF 80 meeting will be broadcast
starting with the commencement of working group sessions on Monday,
November 28, 2011 at 0900 CET (GMT+1) and continue until Friday,
April 1 at 1515 CET.
Wow, six months of streaming.
Julian,
Sorry for an awfully late response, but just spotted this and thought I
should clarify as author of the NroffEdit tool.
NRoffEdit is an all-in-one wysiwyg tool in Java that maintains
the TOC for you (within the .nroff source itself).
Which will only work properly as long the
We've set up a mailing list obscurity-inter...@ietf.org.
You can sign up at:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest
or the usual way, by sending an email with subscribe in the body to
obscurity-interest-requ...@ietf.org
We'll be trying to get together in Prague. According
Folks,
There will be a BOF on protocols to access white space databases at IETF80, on
Monday March 28th at 15:10.
If you are interested and plan to come, please read the following docs before
the BOF:
Problem statement: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-patil-paws-problem-stmt-01.txt
Use case
10 matches
Mail list logo
