On Mar 15, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Hi Paul -
Thanks again for the copious comments; they are greatly appreciated.
> In section 2.2, I would prefer either using the names the tracker currently
> uses for IESG evaluation:
> "Discuss" and "Comment", or some set of words that do no
On 11 February 2011 the IAOC issued an RFP for the development of the xml2rfc
tool. Following community feedback the IAOC put the RFP on hold and requested
community input on the Statement of Work. The comment period ran from 23
February to 9 March 2011.
While the comments didn't result in a
Hi Francis,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : francis.dup...@fdupont.fr [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 mars 2011 16:41
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
Cc : ietf@ietf.org; IETF-Announce; int-a...@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Int-area] Last Call:
Hello all,
We reached the conclusion that the sunset period of 2 years for
advancing DSs to FSs or downgrading of them. However there are some
issues that should also be discussed, such as making references to DSs
during this period, DSs already in IESG processing, etc.
So, I propose to men
